{"id":339931,"date":"2019-02-04T08:00:57","date_gmt":"2019-02-04T13:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newmusicusa.wpengine.com\/?p=339931"},"modified":"2021-06-01T21:31:25","modified_gmt":"2021-06-01T21:31:25","slug":"singers-and-musicians-and-why-our-language-matters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newmusicusa.org\/nmbx\/singers-and-musicians-and-why-our-language-matters\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cSingers and Musicians\u201d and Why Our Language Matters"},"content":{"rendered":"

There it was yet again, this time in an article written by a living composer in October 2018.\u00a0 It stuck out like a four-inch crease in a freshly ironed shirt. While it may first appear\u2014like so many other biases\u2014to be simply a polite substitution, it actually carries a condescension that comes from a long history of implied assumptions that communicate \u201cseparate and certainly not equal.\u201d<\/p>\n

Not even The New York Times<\/em> is immune from this double standard. Quite to the contrary, you\u2019ll come across the phrase hundreds of times if you spend just a few minutes scouring their archives. You\u2019ll find it in headlines and reviews, in news articles, letters, and obituaries:<\/p>\n