Tag: composer memorial

Leo Kraft (1922-2014): Spiky, Tart, and Fierce but also Sweet and Gentle

[Ed. Note: The following essay was adapted from Smaldone’s remarks at the funeral of Leo Kraft.-FJO]

Edward Smaldone and Leo Kraft

Edward Smaldone with Leo Kraft (right) in 2012, on the day Kraft was inducted at the Long Island Music Hall of Fame.

We are all deeply saddened by the passing of one of the “founding fathers” of Music at Queens College.   The Aaron Copland School of Music is a close-knit community of faculty, students, and staff. I knew Leo for 40 years.  He heard my audition on my very first visit to the Aaron Copland School of Music, and somehow saw fit to accept me as a Music Major.  I knew Leo as a teacher, and later as a colleague on the Music faculty.

But today is truly an occasion to rejoice because Leo Kraft was such a significant part of the fabric of the musical life of the college and the city. He loved music. He loved people.  He loved his sons and their families. He loved his wife Amy and in the last 10 years of his life he found a new partner in music and life in Drora Pershing. He loved the music students at Queens College for nearly 70 years, and he loved the life he got to live.

As we are in the age of Facebook, it has been heartwarming for me to see the many pictures of Prof. Kraft at concerts, surrounded by students and colleagues.  These are floating on the internet, as we speak.   That’s how I will always remember Leo: in the thick of it.  He was always engaged.  He didn’t just show up to life, he participated fully. If you think of any picture of him, you can see his smile.  It seems to me it was always a smile that said, “Things are OK.  Things are good.  Life is good.”—though some might say it was the smile of the cat that ate the canary. This was true even in the last few years when he could have easily given in to the various infirmities that come with reaching 90 years of age.  Regardless of the physical challenges he encountered, he never lost that smile.

Leo was a student at the college in the 1940s, joined the faculty immediately, rose to the rank of full professor and served as chair of the music department.  During his time as a teacher he contributed mightily to the musical education of countless students at Queens and also all over the world.  The books he wrote were standard texts in classrooms everywhere.  The New Approach to Sightsinging immediately became and remains to this day one of the leading books of its kind in the world.  Leo wrote that sight-singing book with two other dear departed colleagues, Sol Berkowitz and Gabriel Fontrier.  All three were students of Karol Rathaus and they were a force to be reckoned with in the school.  It is sad to see the last of these Three Musketeers pass from our presence.

In 2012, Leo was inducted into the Long Island Music Hall of Fame, a fitting recognition of his lifetime contribution to music.   The ceremony was at the Paramount Music Hall in Huntington.  The Hall of Fame includes classical musicians such as Morton Gould and Stanley Drucker, as well as many musicians from the world of popular music including Billy Joel, Marvin Hamlisch, and Neil Diamond. It is quite fitting that he will be remembered there.  I was with him on the night of his induction.  A particularly memorable moment was our arrival at the theater: Our instructions had us park our car a few blocks away.  Then we climbed into a vintage 1964 yellow Mustang convertible so that we could “arrive” at the theater where there was a waiting red carpet and photographers.  Not the typical “ride” for a modern composer.  You should have seen that Leo Kraft smile on that occasion.

After his retirement in 1989, Leo remained a fixture in the building:  attending concerts of his own music, those of his colleagues, and countless student recitals. He loved the spirit that music and music making brought to his life.  Leo attended nearly all of those concerts in recent years with Drora by his side, and the two of them exuded a palpable, positive presence, supporting and encouraging the constant musical storm provided by our students.   It meant so much to the students to see these mentors in the audience.  Leo understood this and loved to listen.  It never seemed a chore to him.

I personally had the opportunity to attend many, many concerts with him.  Many times we would drive in to the city together, or meet at concerts.  “Hi, Leo. Are you going to hear so and so at Kaufman? Will you be going to the League/ISCM program? The LICA concert? New Music Series at Miller? Talujon at St. Peters? There’s a recital at Christ and St. Stephen’s…NYU, Riverside Church…the Tenri Institute…The Jewish Museum…Church of the Heavenly Rest…Zankel Hall…The 92nd St. Y. Once in a while, we even went to lesser-known halls like Avery Fisher or the Metropolitan Opera. (And he always knew a good place to eat within a few blocks of any of these places.)  Like many composers, he went to concerts to meet other composers and performers, to hear what others were doing and bring that intelligence back to his own studio.  He had a razor-sharp analytical mind that could also include razor-sharp critique, but he was never bitter.  (He had a favorite saying when he encountered a less than brilliant soprano: “She has a small but unpleasant voice.”)

Leo reveled in his retirement, rising (as he put it) from the rank of “full professor” to the rank of “full composer.” He worked tirelessly on new compositions, and on his existing catalogue.  (He was particularly proud of a recent commission of his last completed piece, To Whom It May Concern, performed in February 2014 at Kaufman Hall by his dear friends in the Da Capo Chamber Ensemble.)  The beautiful music he leaves behind is an enduring place in which his spirit will continue to thrive.  His music had personality, like the man.  And, like the man, it was spiky. It could be tart; it could be sweet.  It could be fierce; it could be gentle.  It was always intelligent; it always had a point of view.  It didn’t waffle or hedge.  It was smart, confident, generous, outgoing, and it always demanded careful attention.  It wasn’t “easy.” He cared too much about music and the art of listening for it to be “easy.” But it was articulate and direct, never intentionally obtuse.

These qualities will live on in my own cherished memories of my dear friend, Queens College Professor Emeritus Leo Kraft. The man and his music were one and the same, in many ways. We have lost one of the longest-standing links to the origins of The Aaron Copland School of Music and one of the last living legacies of our tradition.  We’ve lost a wonderful composer and a true champion of new music.   But Leo was a staunch supporter of future generations of composers through the Leo Kraft Scholarship Endowment, which he established with a major gift just last year. His music and his generosity will continue.

I am personally very grateful to have had him as a friend, mentor, and colleague.  He will be missed, but he will be remembered.
The Aaron Copland School of Music will accept donations in honor of the memory of Prof. Kraft to the Leo Kraft Scholarship Endowment, Aaron Copland School of Music, 65-30 Kissena Blvd. Queens, NY 11367

All the Colors of Life: A Celebration of Fred Ho (1957-2014)

Fred Ho and Marie Incontrera, 2013

Fred Ho with Marie Incontrera on his birthday, August 10, 2013

I had my very first lesson with Fred Ho on March 9, 2011, in his sunny Greenpoint apartment. He was in year five of his eight-year cancer war, but he came across as strong, sturdy, and stoic. I presented him with my best work, a bound score and CD of my lifeblood, and settled back to wait for the critique. I didn’t have to wait long; Fred listened to about thirty seconds of it before flipping the score shut and handing it back to me with one word.

“BORING.”

This is how I remember Fred: brazen honesty, sharp-tongued wit, vibrant virtuosity in every area of life. It was that moment that I pledged to know Fred for life, however long or short our time might be together. That day was the first of many lessons; week after month after year I would come to sit at his kitchen table and lay bare my heart and soul, opening myself up to the pain of self-reflection and growth that comes with becoming.

“You write too quickly,” Fred told me once.
“Take more risks,” he said constantly.

Fred gave me work that would keep me up until three in the morning, high on aural hallucination. Write 50 two-, three-, or four-measure ostinati in odd meters, all starting on the low E of the bass. Write an opera and produce it yourself. Collaborate with me on an arrangement and conduct my band. Copy this score and tell me what you’ve learned. In this, I was more apprentice than student, and he was more family than friend. Our time together bridged the waters of music and delved into politics, healing, life, and death.

Fred has a way of creating family wherever he goes. He had no children of his own, but his sons and daughters of musical revolution gathered around him unrelentingly through the worst of it. As we coordinated bringing Fred food on Christmas Eve and argued like siblings over the best way to feel six and a half beats, I realized that family is not always blood but a collective heartbeat. I wonder if Fred knew this all along, raising us through demonstrations of the toughest love into littler versions of his own spirit, holding the next successes just over our heads so that when we finally catch them, we are just a tiny bit older and wiser.

I like to remember Fred marching around a church with his saxophone quartet, the sound filling the room and filling my soul. The music lifts me up, above life and death and the quicksand of my grief, and I experience for the first time the instance of redemption in music.

“Black music is about the redemption of the soul,” Fred says as we sit at his kitchen table. “It’s about turning your pain into power.”

If nothing else, Fred has done exactly this with his life. Fred’s power has come from his transcendental suffering: he fights radically against injustice, fights cancer with a big band, infuses his students with virtuosity through strategic boot camping. I endure the latter willingly and gratefully, absorbing the chord progressions and musicological essays into the quick of my being. Fred’s teachings are in my blood, and I carry his politics and bass lines in the pockets of my soul so that they are with me wherever I go.

I like to remember Fred on our trips to the thrift store, poring through the bins of clothing for the next colorful treasure. I like to remember him in his handmade neon green suit, laughing with friends at a book release party after his 2011 surgery left him without a bladder or bowel—and, for a little while, without cancer.

I like to remember Fred, five days post-heart attack, on the day of a snowstorm that threatened to shut down the city, leading his big band as if his life depended on it. In hindsight, I recognize that it absolutely did.

I like to remember Fred as he stood on a stage for the very last time, greeted by a standing ovation, obliterating every register of his baritone saxophone like nobody’s business. Terminal, six months to the day before he died.

It’s hard to think of Fred without a new melody coming from the pencils he kept sharpened at his desk. And yet, as time passed, Fred’s thoughts became preoccupied with survival rather than beauty. When Fred could no longer manage it, he handed over his legacy like the keys to a kingdom and I am tasked with understanding the complexity of an entire life, of filling the shoes at his podium. As I humbly adjust to my new role, I begin to see Fred’s 56 short years for what they were: brilliant, and enough to fit six lifetimes.

I see Fred’s final big band work, Grace of the Guerrilla, My Love, as a trajectory of Fred’s epic and unique life. It is drum-cadenza-for-the-ages into altissimo-saxophone-virtuosity into acrobatic-trumpeting-dream-sequence into a final groove in six-and-a-half time, complete with a tongue-in-cheek quote that I affectionately call “Mission Impossible on steroids” and building into collective solos that end on a high note. It is a mammoth and monumental masterpiece that is at once cacophonous and groovy, easy to love and difficult to understand. It goes out much like Fred did: with a bang, not a whimper.
To have known Fred is to know how to end one’s life beautifully: staring death in the face unafraid, surrounded by love that has been both born into and chosen, sharing with the world as much beauty and justice as is humanly possible. I was one of the lucky ones: I got to look into Fred’s eyes and tell him I love him one last time. And yet no matter how well Fred prepared us, he goes gracefully before we are ready for him to, leaving us with the imprint of his spirit upon our hearts.

*

Fred Ho passed away on the morning of Saturday, April 12, 2014, in his home in Greenpoint, Brooklyn, ending an eight-year battle with metastatic colorectal cancer. He is survived by his mother, Frances Lu Houn, two sisters, Florence Houn and Flora Houn Hoffman and their families, and his companion, Melanie West. He leaves behind a legendary body of musical work; several books he either authored or co-edited about political theory and the cultural politics of music; a revolutionary political movement, Scientific Soul Sessions; two big bands; and a distinct Afro-Asian aesthetic.
There will be no funeral; Fred will be cremated and his ashes will be spread over the sea of Kauai, Hawaii, where he will swim forever among the coral reefs. A memorial is being organized for a later date and will be held at BAM Cafe in Brooklyn. A celebration concert with the Eco-Music Big Band will be held later this month on April 23, 2014, with concerts at 7:30 p.m. and 9:30 p.m. at Ginny’s Supper Club on 310 Lenox Avenue in New York City.

*

[Ed. Note: To read, watch and listen to a conversation with Fred Ho for NewMusicBox (originally recorded on October 8, 2008), click here.]

Remembering Robert Ashley (1930-2014)

Robert Ashley

Robert Ashley in 1985 during the Chicago performances of Atalanta (Acts of God). (All photos herein courtesy Jacqueline Humbert unless otherwise noted.)

By now most readers will have already heard the sad news of the passing of composer Robert Ashley on Monday, March 3, 2014. There have been numerous obituaries from around the world which have offered extremely eloquent tributes to his enormous contribution to American music and, in particular, to contemporary opera. Since Ashley’s work was by design extremely collaborative, we wanted to honor his memory on NewMusicBox by having his key collaborators—each of whom are important creators in their own right—share their personal stories about working with him over the decades.—FJO

Joan La Barbara
Thomas Buckner
Jacqueline Humbert
Tom Hamilton
“Blue” Gene Tyranny
Sam Ashley
Melody Sumner Carnahan
Dave Ruder
Alvin Lucier

CelestialExcursions

From a performance of Celestial Excursions in Germany, 2004: (left to right) Robert Ashley, Jacqueline Humbert, Joan La Barbara, Sam Ashley, and Thomas Buckner.

Joan La Barbara
To begin at the beginning, I first worked with Robert Ashley in 1974 at the Musée d’Art Moderne in Paris, a wonderful structure and, as I recall, round.  The Sonic Arts Union had been invited by Festival d’Automne, and David Behrman and Alvin Lucier had each conceived new vocal pieces for me.  David’s was Voice with Melody-Driven Electronics and Alvin’s, Still and Moving Lines of Silence in Families of Hyperbolas.  Bob decided to have me play solo viola, which lay in my lap; I dragged the bow over a string very slowly making non-pitched ticks that were fed to a complex electronic gating system which allowed a story Mimi Johnson was telling to be heard by the audience (or not) depending on whether the gates were opened or closed.  I didn’t quite understand how the gating worked but as I listened to Mimi, I realized that she was relating a story about us and was getting to a part that I wasn’t sure I’d like revealed in public, so I managed to get those gates closed.  It was a good time to be in Paris.
I interviewed Bob for the SoHo Weekly News, a publication that was left free on SoHo doorsteps in the ‘70s. (Ah, those were the days…)  I had decided to write preview articles because I was appalled that my fellow composers were being reviewed so badly (if at all) and that perhaps by providing some insight into the work in advance, they’d get a better chance at being understood by critics as well as the audience (especially since some eschewed program notes altogether).  Bob and I spoke about the “internal dialogue” as he called it, the “conversation” that one has with oneself before allowing words to leave the mind and take up their existence in the outside world.  It was a concept that fascinated me, affecting a lot of my work and one piece in particular, Performance Piece, which I subtitled Ashley gave me an idea, dealing with the process of thought involved in real-time composition (sometimes referred to as “improvisation”) and requiring that in performance when I was thinking in “pure” sound, i.e. music, I would reveal that but when I started analyzing, as we often do when composing in real-time, I had to let the words flow out.  It is more difficult than it sounds, involving crashing the barrier between left and right brain activities.
Bob’s clarity of thought in conversation was astounding, delving deeply into process as well as profoundly exposing personal experience.

The operas reflected his view of the world, taking his own stories and blending them with historical fact, fiction, and fantasy to build complex interwoven tales that required several hearings to fathom (if then).  During pre-rehearsal periods, the individual singers would discuss the nature of their characters with Bob, learning only somewhat later how he had constructed each one based on his perception of some aspect of the singer’s own personality and persona layered into the texture.  He gave us each tonal centers onto which we imparted our own take on the story, the message, and how the person we were playing might inflect it, based on background, circumstance, upbringing, status, life history.  And yes, there were the “songs” that we each, as all good singers do, made our own.  But the words, the tonality, the chord structures, the underpinning, the music, were all Bob.  (Though we did grouse a bit from time to time about not being given more direct instruction, we did get direction, correction, and encouragement to go further with each interpretation.)

If I had to pick one opera as a favorite, I guess I’d choose Dust.  It is direct and clear in its political message—that old men wage wars and young men fight them (now young women, too, but the Korean war, which Dust was about, more or less, was fought by young men—except for the nurses, doctors, drivers—but I digress).  It has songs that can be sung and remembered.  It wears its heart on its sleeve, the way Bob often did; it was raw, revelatory, insightful, direct, and confrontational, with a few obscenities thrown in for emphasis.  The characters were larger-than-life in-your-face tell-it-like-it-is, yet with that tinge of sadness, melancholy even, reflecting back as it drove home the truth inside the stories.

The production process was complex.  Bob wrote and rewrote before the drafts were sent to the singers.  The instructions were in the scores but the depth came in individual sessions when we discussed the characters and their pain, their joy, their world views.  Then we each went our separate ways to work on how to let one’s voice reveal the inner truths, the opinions.

We worked several weeks in the recording studio at Mills College, creating the tracks for Improvement, learning to “ghost” each other’s vocal inflections and deliveries, adjusting to each other’s quirks and traits, subsuming one’s own personality into another’s to “get it right.”  These were the work sessions that went into the CD tracks, that became the backing tracks, that were played back through in-ear monitors, that we then improved upon in live performance even as we had to keep matching what we had already done.  Not easy, these tasks.

Layers of complexity: verbal, sonic, vocal; intentionality hidden, lessons imparted.  Bob was continually reshaping the performance, even moments before we walked onstage.  “Do it faster”  or “Lay back, don’t push.”  Process that as you exit the wings.  The “Notes” came before, rarely after each performance.  Not to throw us off balance but to up the ante, sharpen the awareness, rip the rug out so we wouldn’t become too secure or settled in any one interpretation or delivery.

Now Eleanor’s Idea had several versions, especially with the advice letters, as Now Eleanor (the name of the principal character) gradually receives the information, the “word”, the language, the passion.  It goes beyond speaking in tongues to absorbing and processing the culture of The Other.  Lessons learned, lives perfected, infinite repetitions until … now, no more.

Music with Roots in the Aether, the set of videos Bob conceived and directed on a select group of composers whose work he felt needed more explication, is a set of gems that have yet to be fully studied and appreciated.  Each places the composer’s interview in a setting designed to reveal a central aspect of that person’s being. (He let the music speak for itself.)

How does one discuss years of knowing even over great distances?  Years of exploring another composer’s process and ideas and way and means of notating or disseminating information will take years of reflection and more than a few words.

How do I process his loss?  I am still coming to grips with it, looking back over the years and reflecting on lessons learned, stories told, funny experiences, as well as more than a bit of sorrow that there was not more time to do the work and do it even better the next time.  There is a new generation of singers taking up the older works with their own interpretations, and taking up the new work, which we will experience soon at The Whitney and elsewhere.
Good-bye, Bob.  You will be missed more than you could have known.

Ashley in Lithuania

Mimi Johnson, Robert Ashley, Jacqueline Humbert, and Joan La Barbara in Vilnius, Lithuania in November 2004 for performances of Celestial Excursions.

Thomas Buckner
It is difficult to write about his work, so soon after the death of my dear friend and colleague, Robert Ashley. He was not only a wonderful composer and writer, but also a deeply compassionate man and a dear friend. I will take refuge in some history, and see where that leads.

In 1982, the Arch Ensemble for Experimental Music, based in Berkeley, California, which I founded and co-directed with composer/conductor/bassoonist Robert Hughes, received a consortium grant from the National Endowment for the Arts and got to choose a composer to commission. We chose Robert Ashley, whose work we had become familiar with partly due to the fact that he was director of Mills College’s Center for Contemporary Music (the world’s first public access electronic music studio, as far as we know). Robert Hughes said at the time, and I agreed, that Robert Ashley had “the most original mind in contemporary music.”

Little did I know at the time that that decision would lead to my spending the next thirty years working with Robert Ashley, during which time I had ample evidence of his originality as well as his unique understanding of the nature of speech as music. Bob had heard me perform in California, and so, instead of a piece of occasional music, he set the “Odalisque” arias, from his then current opera Atalanta (Acts of God), for baritone and chamber orchestra. He chose to write out the speech rhythms in musical notation since we would not be rehearsing the piece together. It was very complicated, a real challenge. I know from this experience how much more efficient and natural Bob’s alternative notation is for his work. I had just returned to my hometown of New York City after 20 years in California, so I didn’t yet have much work and had a lot of time. My roommate in New York was the great hand drummer Big Black, best known for his work with Dizzy Gillespie and Randy Weston. Black learned the rhythm of my part by ear, as he did not read music, and we performed it over and over until it was locked in. I went to Bob’s apartment, just across Canal Street from where I was living, and sang the part for Bob. Unbeknownst to me, this was the beginning of an audition. Bob came out to the performance in San Francisco, and afterwards asked me to sing in the next performance of Atalanta, which was to be in Rome in a couple of months. When he found out that I could sing in Italian, he had the Odalisque arias translated into Italian for the Rome performances, the first of which became the recording of the opera. It was a baptism by fire, singing with the great “Blue” Gene Tyranny and Bob’s tape part, made with the Golbranson Palice organ that he had also used in Perfect Lives.
Speaking Italian is much closer to singing than speaking English, so the “Odalisque” arias are fully sung in a recitative style, “spontaneous musical invention based on the natural declamation of the text,” as Bob called it. It was a perfect fit for me, as was the next piece Bob composed for me, My Brother Called, which combined composed melismatic singing on the syllable “oo” with spontaneously invented speech song based of the declamation of the text. We met several days a week to develop the style of that piece, which eventually became part of his opera eL/Aficionado. Whenever I perform a work of Bob’s, people always say he writes for my voice better than anyone else. He knew his singers’ strengths and weaknesses better than we do ourselves.

In all the many pieces he has composed over the years, Bob has never repeated himself, either musically or in his extraordinary texts. Yet his music always sounds like him. I know of no higher praise.

eL_Aficionado

Thomas Buckner, Jacqueline Humbert (seated), Robert Ashley, and Sam Ashley in eL/Aficionado, Geneva 1994.

Jacqueline Humbert
It is difficult to express how significant an impact, how great an influence one life can have on another. I will make an attempt though it will be incomplete and inadequate.

I had known of Robert Ashley’s innovative music for years before beginning to work with him in 1980, first as a designer and subsequently as a performer. I admired his great intelligence and astonishing imagination. He was astoundingly prolific as well. Over the years he became a north star for me; an inspiration, a creative genius, and one of the best friends I’ve ever had.
It was both an honor and a pleasure to have worked with Robert for so many years. Through his many operas the ensemble toured internationally, were recorded and broadcast widely, and given the chance to perform the vivid characters Robert created, so varied from opera to opera. Robert was incredibly generous in providing the many opportunities to all who worked with him for so many years and we are all so very grateful and humbled by the experience.

Robert had it all; grace, charm, wit, and a voice like velvet or smoke, depending on the character. He is already sorely missed. The world has lost one of the truly great ones.

RobertAshley and JacquelineHumbert

Jacqueline Humbert and Robert Ashley at a recording studio in the mid 1990s.

Tom Hamilton
Originally, Bob knew me as a composer who was fairly new to New York. One evening in 1990 he saw me at a concert and said, “Tom—what do you know about this Macintosh MIDI stuff?” I told him that I made my living as a freelance recording engineer. He said “Really, I didn’t know that” and took my card. The next day he followed up and invited me to his studio. (I thought I was there to fix a piece of equipment.) What he wanted was someone to work with him every day and finish the CD version of his new opera Improvement (Don Leaves Linda) for Nonesuch Records. The studio was pretty bare bones at that point and so we built it up to be able to create the electronic orchestra and do a multi-track mix. I had come from a traditional studio background—large tape machines and bulky gear in general. I discovered that Bob had that same background, though dating from even earlier origins. And like Bob, I also came from an electronic music background, working with the earliest analog synthesizers, developing an oblique approach to composing, and running a studio at a university. This was all very familiar territory.

Later in 1990, Bob got some gigs in Honolulu and Portland for a small grouping of his ensemble. He asked me to be part of the tour, which enlarged my role from just working in the studio to doing the mixes and audio processing on the live performances as well. The style for me was much less pre-planned than in the studio recordings, and Bob encouraged me to develop the mixes as improvisational performances. It felt like I was creating a fictitious sound world for the singers to live in.

In an important way, that first year that I worked with Bob set the tone for what became a quarter-century music lesson. Bob was very generous in sharing his knowledge and insights, and in the studio, when he’d say “let’s take a break,” it could mean a 10 minute concept discussion on something we might have heard the night before. Or I would ask him about something bothering me on one of my own pieces, and he would come up with just the right aphorism. “If you have a system—stick to it!” was something that he practiced daily. His cautionary “don’t make the ship too big to fly” saved more than one session from ending up in a cul-de-sac.

Much has been written about the colorful and insightful texts in Bob’s operas. In 2001 Bob did a reading at Black Oak Books in Berkeley in conjunction with a performance at Mills College. The person introducing him said that, “Ashley’s writing makes experts out of all of us.” There was always that quality in the air; he would write or say something and a beat later we would think, “Oh yeah.” Except that Bob thought of it first. It’s part of what made the experience of the tours so unique. That feeling that it was beyond just doing the work; it was stretching the brain into a new form.

The texts in Bob’s operas have kept his fans enthralled for decades. A prominent characteristic was a story being told in a style that created an ambiguity between pitch and narration. “Is it singing or is it speaking?” the critics would fret. Bob always called it singing. I never heard him describe it any other way. It forced a different idea of what music could be. Listening to any of the stories in Dust as performed by Bob, Sam Ashley, Tom Buckner, Jacquie Humbert, and Joan La Barbara, you can hear that dichotomy played out with much variety, depending on mood, style, and the individual character that was developed. Last year Bob recorded a long solo part to a forthcoming opera called Quicksand. There was always a reference pitch in his headphones. And how those vocal resonances and references would play out was still an unknown, as the orchestras hadn’t been developed beforehand.

Less has been said about the electronic musical structures in Bob’s work that I helped make in all of the operas since 1990. For each piece, we would work at least a year just on the electronic orchestras (and he always called them “orchestras” and organized them that way). He was very eager to learn more about MIDI and the operation of sequencing software. Even at a time when the popularity of the MIDI protocol started to fade he would always say that for him “it was a dream come true.” He typically would spend a morning transferring his notations, calculations, and separations from paper to workstation. I would arrive in the afternoon and one or both of us could start out by trying out instruments, adding layers, and coaxing the synthesizers into fulfilling one or another possibility of a particular sonic element. The resulting orchestras would provide the sonic framework or context for the singers.

Very often the resulting accompaniments would start accumulating complexity. Bob loved to hear multiple rhythmic delays swinging the notes around in the background, and some of these same processes would eventually be used with the singers as well. But we would usually create a separate track just for the singers consisting of basic chords, click track, and other helpful cues, as a way for them to navigate through the sonic traffic. By doing this, we could get as fancy as we needed with the accompaniment while making sure that we weren’t creating unnecessary performance confusion. In the rehearsals, the singers would be free to develop their characters unencumbered by the distracting accompaniment elements that we loved hearing in the final mix.
After working for one or two years on these pieces, we would start doing performances, often somewhere in Europe, where I would perform the sound mixing and processing, having then been part of the process from the first session to the final performance. And there was compensation in having an extended family that reached beyond the work itself; a group that could make something that sounded good, then fight about restaurant choices, take a day off together, and just stay in touch. And Bob always treated me at face value: I was a composer and a sound designer. Both things at once.

Every now and then, Bob would tell me that he had nominated me for some award, which I would then shrug off as a hopeless and quixotic mission. He would just lecture me, “You probably won’t get it, but you’ve got to go for it.” Only once did it work and it was enough for me to go to a festival and present a piece for a week.

I’m working right now with a group of 6 wonderful young singers, developing Bob’s last opera CRASH for the Whitney Biennial. They are the newest group of talented people to love Bob’s music and to work on it so diligently. CRASH is Bob’s most autobiographical piece. There are references to many of the pieces I’ve worked on in the past, and to stories from an earlier time that I’ve only heard in the retelling. As usual, Bob figured out a way to make music out of the words themselves. It’s a wonderful way for me to stay in the present.

Ashley Dinner in Europe 1999

A break during the 1999 European tour of Dust; (left to right) Joan La Barbara, Sam Ashley, “Blue” Gene Tyranny, Tom Hamilton, Jacqueline Humbert, and Robert Ashley.

“Blue” Gene Tyranny
I first met Robert Ashley in 1962 when I was 17 and he was 32. I had just left home in Texas with all my belongings in a paper bag and headed for Ann Arbor where a friend said a wonderful new music scene was happening like the one Phillip Krumm and I started in San Antonio. I had heard a few early electronic works by Robert (e.g. The Fourth of July) before I came.
When I got to Michigan on the bus I was given a place to stay with Gordon and Jackie Mumma and Mary Ashley helped me find work at the Institute for Social Research.  And Robert said, “Bob Sheff has arrived in town, so let’s do a concert.” That’s the way I began working with him for the next more than 50 years, starting with the ONCE Festival and the whole lifestyle. (ONCE was more than just a concert once a year.)

Robert was an accomplished pianist having been misled by his friends into being recruited into the Army band in Texas. He taught me the secret of bebop. Robert was my friend and also acted as a mentor—he being 15 years older than me—in a big brother style, which I greatly appreciated. He always encouraged the people he knew as well as his students to develop whatever fascinated them, but like the best teachers never imposed a style or a “correct solution” and this has been appreciated by the many people he encouraged. In a similar way, inspired by Bob, contributors put together the ONCE festival, the ONCE group, and the Sonic and Arts Union. In Ann Arbor, he and Gordon Mumma created the Cooperative Studio for Electronic Music which later led to the establishment of the Center for Contemporary Music at Mills College in Oakland, California, a non-profit public-access facility where synthesizers, a recording studio, a film editing studio, and a new music library plus one or more free concerts every week could be accessed by anyone.

All of Robert’s compositions show his admirable intelligence, gentle humor, and love of humanity. One of the earliest graphic and electronic pieces, She Was a Visitor for chorus with audience participation, is about how the actual sound the phonemes making up a word add an extra layer of meaning; this is how rumor is spread. (“It sounds like she’s arriving by trains, boats, and planes.”) His opera Perfect Lives is about the subtle realities of a small American town, a fascination which he and I shared in our different pieces. Robert Ashley made the first change in the structure and content of opera in the last 300 years.

All the personalities mentioned in Robert’s operas are appreciations of real people. His earlier graph pieces have personages like Kit Carson and Sitting Bull. There are references in his later operas to Giordano Bruno and Peanut, who now sits in the traffic island with the other disenfranchised people of Dust, remembering their lives. Some works are partially or wholly autobiographical and all persons are presented in a very touching and moving way. In his compositions, Robert often showed his compassion for abused and marginalized persons. For example, in Van Cao’s Meditation, he showed the Vietnamese composer still working on his pieces in isolation even though Van Cao was ostracized politically in his country. Bruno, who figures in Perfect Lives and Improvement (Don Leaves Linda), was burned at the stake for his discoveries and religious beliefs.
Like the most original composers (for example John Cage), each piece of Robert’s will teach you something you didn’t know before, and while the structure will be exact, each performance will come out completely different every time you perform it. “Confusion just means you are learning something,” he said. There was a mass excitement at the end of a performance of Combination Wedding and Funeral at the Judson Memorial Church in New York City in the ‘60s.

Many of Bob’s instructions to me about various pieces required me to realize a concept, for example in Dust he said to me, “No patterns. No melody. No harmonies. Just make sounds that are somehow your impression of playing the piano and trying to interest a girl dancer (Joan Jonas) who shares the stage with you.” In order to do that I had to go back in my mind to before I studied the piano and forget everything.

Robert prepared his friends for his passing, again with humor. He remarked toward the end, “Well, no more solitude.” There are many subtle conceptual works that are probably just being understood now, for instance the Illusion Models and the String Quartet Describing the Motions of Large Real Bodies, which like The Wolfman deals with the transformation of people in a world with random or Brownian Motion where that randomness is seen as a natural part of life rather than an abstraction. Conceptual art is not the same as abstract art.

Dinner in Paris

Dinner in Paris following a performance of Dust in July 2001. Left to right: Thomas Buckner, Jacqueline Humbert, “Blue” Gene Tyranny, Cas Boumans, David Moodey, Sam Ashley, Joan La Barbara, and Robert Ashley.

Sam Ashley
I feel honored that I was able to work with Bob for so many years. It would be hard to say just how much I learned from him. It’s more like everything I know about music has been influenced by Bob and his work. He was a wonderful composer and to be sure a very dear friend.

Here’s something interesting: Bob based even his choices about his death on an idea of 14 year cycles. Why this simple fact is so wonderfully amazing is that it shows what music should really be about: living your ideas; practicing what you preach. Where the idea of 14 year cycles might have come from is not important here; in fact even the specific idea itself is not the point. What’s so wonderfully impressive is just that he would not hesitate to make the most fundamental choices according to his musical ideas.

Outstanding.

About sadness…
Yes, Bob died.

I have gotten really many personal messages from people expressing their sadness. They say “I feel so horrible…” then they add “…and I know you are feeling horrible too.”

But allow me to introduce something radical: don’t do the sadness part. Yes I know what’s intended: the sadness when somebody we love dies says he/she meant a lot. That’s wonderful. But the radical thing is to separate that appreciation, admiration, love from the sadness, keeping the loving admiration and respect, but dispensing with the heavy sadness.

Now, I know that sounds real strange to a lot of people. I have tried to express this several times over the years when friends I loved have died, and it has never really been easy to convey. So I understand. But I have to keep saying it. I mean, to care, to know that it matters, yes! That’s all good stuff.

There’s some background to this. Please don’t read this the wrong way, and I don’t know how to say it without running the risk of seeming pretentious, but: I have been a mystic for more than 45 years. An actual “shaman.” That’s not a word I toss around because it’s cool. I’m sure I’ve spent at least one third of my actual lifetime in trance. Being a mystic for real just means one thing ultimately: trance, lots of trance (“meditation”, whatever). Like hours/day every day. Everything that could be considered real “shamanism” flows from that. Because of this I have come to be (sorry if this sounds pretentious, hopefully it doesn’t) more comfortable with my own mortality. More than I would have been without the mysticism let’s say. So honestly, when someone I love dies, and I know that they were aware of what they were doing, it’s not something to be screwed up about. If you want to meet somebody in the spirit world… then be careful with the heavy emotions. They overwhelm the subtle stuff.

Now, some of you may know that I was in New York just recently visiting Bob and Mimi. I can tell you that it was my opinion that Bob could put his will behind healing and hang around for a few more years. Just for fun. And by the way Bob had such a strong intuition that he could have been a mystic if he had wanted to be. He was one in some ways. I mean he wasn’t in the full time sense, but he had a natural talent for it that was absolutely top notch. But the point here, of this letter, is: he decided that he didn’t want to try to heal. And I do mean this. He decided. He felt intuitively that he couldn’t recover. (He specifically told me that.) So although I disagreed, I can see it like, say he had decided to move to another city. I might think it’s a dumb move and tell him so, but to imagine that I’m entitled to say “No you can’t do that. I won’t allow it.” That would be sort of absurd. Ultimately it’s his choice. No big deal. Bob died like that. And incidentally he says so in his last piece CRASH (a beautiful piece, too).

So, look, I love you all for caring and I really do mean that. Thanks. But honestly, don’t worry. Keep it light. Trust in what I say here, and maybe even look into finding those things for yourself, too. Sadness is not doing anybody any good. And I know for a fact that Bob had pretty much the same attitude; he didn’t want anybody to be all consumed with sadness. That’s why he didn’t receive visitors for the most part in the last month or so.

Dust

Thomas Buckner, Sam Ashley, Robert Ashley, and Jacqueline Humbert during the Japanese tour of Dust in 1998.

Melody Sumner Carnahan
Nothing I had ever read or heard affected me like hearing Robert Ashley’s recording of “The Backyard” through a clock radio in a studio apartment in Palo Alto in 1978. After listening over and over to “the yellow record” I realized that free will was possible. I knew what I wanted to do. I followed that voice to Mills College where Bob agreed to be part of my 3-headed MFA committee (creative writing, book arts, and media arts). During the following decades, he lent his voice to many of my stories, which has resulted in audioworks and CDs.

As founder and editor of Burning Books, I worked closely with Bob to publish four complete librettos as books, beginning with his opera Improvement, and including Perfect Lives, Atalanta, and Quicksand. Working on books with Bob was such an education because of his precision with language and his completely original perspective on just about everything. The photo below was taken in 1984 when I was interviewing him for The Guests Go In To Supper.

Melody Carnhan with Robert Ashley

Melody Sumner Carnahan with Robert Ashley, courtesy Melody Sumner Carnahan.

Bob was always a big supporter of my writing. He read and commented on everything I sent him. I read everything of his I could get my hands on. He wrote real letters. I conducted many interviews with him, in bars, in his studio, at my various residences in Oakland and New Mexico. During some of the lean years in New Mexico, Bob and Mimi kept Burning Books busy working on projects like Bob’s low rider opera, Now Eleanor’s Idea. He always surpassed himself. Never repeated anything. His thriller-ish novel, Quicksand (2011), was written to be produced verbatim as an opera libretto. Concrete is a monumental work in an entirely new form.

Bob began a memoir in recent years, which he later expanded for CRASH, which Burning Books will publish along with Concrete. Bob left us many masterpieces and much to do.

Afterbank

Robert Ashley with the next generation of performers who have embraced his music: Paul Pinto, Dave Ruder, Aliza Simons, and Gelsey Bell from the 2011 Varispeed production of Perfect Lives. Photo by Leonor Torres, courtesy Dave Ruder.

Dave Ruder
Recently a good friend, a singer by training and by vocation, commented that in my bio these days “vocalist” is the first of multiple descriptors I give myself. She was surprised. I thought it over. I’ve never been supremely confident in myself as a clarinetist, don’t seem that special compared to the million other guitarists around, haven’t been composing much per se in the last few years, have barely touched electronics of late. And yet, I find myself very busy musically. What is it that I do then, and when did it all start revolving around my voice? It all goes back to Robert Ashley.

Ashley’s biography gives hope to searching eclectics. It took him years to take his piano playing seriously, but he let it go a few years after finally feeling up to snuff. In his 30s, he made a name for himself with his style of open composition, dealing primarily with group dynamics, but gave up composing before the decade was out. In academia, he earned a doctorate but never claimed it and helped build a renowned music program at Mills, but it wasn’t where his heart was. And then, in his 40s, starting from the ground up, he used what materials he had at hand, most of all his own voice, redolent of Michigan with hints of the South and mixed in California and New York, and he made an astonishing body of work.

That was his journey. Mine is a very different one, but thus far it’s also brought me to my voice. There were years of warming up to this idea, in which I told and retold myself the melodious jokes of Perfect Lives like a middle schooler fawning over a PG-13 comedy. There were early attempts at performing the piece in public by reading it, which grew into the interpretations by Varispeed, through which we came to know Bob. Getting to hear his voice in conversation gave me new insight into the ways he heightened his speech into something more musical. The way he explained it to the cast of That Morning Thing, struggling to find the right way to pose short, simple questions in rehearsal, was that you had to “make it a little song”. At first, it was difficult to highlight what he was doing that differed from his everyday cadence, but gradually, with little other instruction, the switch flipped and we were all going crazy with our newfound powers of musical speech.

One of the greatest things that can be said for Bob’s band-leading is that he recognized that his iconic voice was best left to himself and he always allowed performers to find and develop their own voice. A piece like Concrete is a beautiful example of singers telling stories that at once convey Bob and the singer with complete clarity. In putting together Bob’s final piece, CRASH, the six vocalists have been asked to articulate three primary voices of narration, each vocalist inhabiting one of these voices at some point in the opera. While we’ve worked to fully explore the implications of each voice and have incorporated styles and techniques from one another with Bob’s blessing, we are ultimately playing the parts in our own ways.

The influence of the music of Robert Ashley is so thoroughly assimilated into my core that it’s never far away. In the too short time I got to know, he helped me find what was unique about myself. His vote of confidence in my work inspires me to work harder, be more open and more honest. His work remains a familiar mystery, to be puzzled over for decades to come, and through my investigations I’m amazed to come back home to my own voice. Thanks Bob.

Ashley European Tour 1999

Robert Ashley (far right) and his entourage during their 1999 European tour.

Alvin Lucier
I remember one night in L’Aquila, a beautiful city in the Abruzzi Mountains of Italy, the Sonic Arts Union—Bob, David Behrman, Gordon Mumma and myself—were sleeping in a dormitory room arranged for us by our sponsor. Throughout the night we could hear Bob reciting something in his sleep. He may have been rehearsing one of his vocal pieces or practicing ranting, a form of utterance he picked up and admired from those deranged people roaming the streets of New York. Anyway, it was entertaining and didn’t bother us at all. It was simply a part of touring with Bob.

For a few years in the early ’70s Bob Ashley wore a leather jacket.  Every time he moved there was a crackling sound. He was a walking sound piece.  If you closed your eyes and he walked into the room, you would know it was him.  We were talking once about the future of music and he said he thought it was going to consist of pops and clicks.

Sometime around 1970 or so, the Sonic Arts Union was performing at Antioch College in Yellow Springs, Ohio.  After the concert Bob and I went out for a drink. Since Yellow Springs was dry, we had to drive to Xenia (coincidentally the name of John Cage’s first wife), Ohio. We drove through cornfields.  You know how straight those roads are. Pretty soon we came upon a roadhouse. We went in and the first thing we saw was a huge electric organ. It was just sitting there idle. I think it was a Wurlitzer. There was a row of men and women sitting up at the bar talking to each other very seriously.  It seemed to me that none of the couples was married because they were having such interesting conversations. They were having fun, smoking and drinking.  We sat down and Bob started talking about Jimmy Smith, the jazz organist, and the legendary pianist Bud Powell. After a while we went into Xenia to get something to eat. When we stopped at the same roadhouse on the way back, the scene was exactly the same. Here were these Perfect Lives going on and on. It felt timeless.

Robert Ashley in Japan

Robert Ashley in Japan for the seven city tour of Improvement in 1994.

A Master Communicator: Remembering H. Owen Reed (1910-2014)

[Ed. Note: When Elliott Carter died in 2012 only a month shy of his 104th birthday the news made international headlines and even landed on the front page of The New York Times. In a great many of the memorials to Carter, writers opined about how he had been the last surviving composer of his generation, a link to a past which we no longer had. But another significant centenarian, H. Owen Reed, survived him, a composer with albeit a somewhat different, but also exemplary, career trajectory.

A Francophile as was Carter, Reed, who was born in Odessa, Missouri in 1910, obtained his Bachelor’s Degree in French in 1937 shortly after receiving Bachelor and Master’s Degrees in Music from Louisiana State University. But rather than going to Paris to study with Nadia Boulanger, as Carter had done a few years earlier, Reed, who also counted among his most significant compositional mentors an important female pedagogue, Helen M. Gunderson (1909-1997), enrolled at the Eastman School of Music where—under the tutelage of Howard Hanson and Bernard Rogers—he obtained a Ph.D. just two years later in 1939. Private studies followed with Roy Harris, Aaron Copland, Leonard Bernstein, and Bohuslav Martinu, among others. He was honored with a Guggenheim Fellowship in 1949 which resulted in his spending six months in Mexico studying local folk music. That experience informed what his arguably his most popular composition, La Fiesta Mexicana, a work which has been performed all over the world and has appeared on numerous wind band albums since its premiere recording under the direction of the legendary Frederick Fennell. Because of the success of this composition, Reed has been credited with kindling many composers’ interest in writing for wind ensembles, something he continued to do extensively throughout his long career, although his output also encompassed works for symphony orchestra, chamber ensembles, and opera. While he might not be categorized as an avant-gardist, many of his scores explored unconventional musical notations and extended techniques. He composed extensively for jazz groups as well and his Latin-tinged “El Muchacho” was recorded by Cal Tjader.

A lifelong learner, into his late 60s, Reed was still embarking on field trips, traveling to Norway and the Caribbean to study the traditional music of those regions. His immersion in Native American culture, which involved extended stays at tribal reservations in Arizona and New Mexico inspired a trilogy of chamber operas based on Native American folktales. And Reed also remained active as a jazz performer, leading combos since his early 20s. Just last year, at the age of 102, he was still improvising at the piano.


Among Reed’s most important legacies was his devotion to younger composers. He spent four decades teaching composition at Michigan State University where he remained Professor Emeritus after his retirement in 1976. His many students included David Maslanka and Adophus Hailstork as well as the late Clare Fischer (1928-2012) who, in addition to his own compositions, arranged music for artists ranging from Dizzy Gillespie and the Hi-Los to Prince and Celine Dion. Reed also authored nine books which remain important reference materials for music students.
After learning of Reed’s death on January 6, it seemed most appropriate to contact someone who had ties to him both as a student and a professional colleague and someone who shared his passions for both contemporary composition and jazz improvisation. So we approached composer/percussionist Charles Ruggiero who had a nearly half century-long friendship with Dr. Reed (as he called him throughout his life), first as his student and subsequently as a fellow composition teacher at MSU. Ruggiero’s detailed account of that remarkable relationship offers those of us who were never fortunate enough to get to know H. Owen Reed, a personal sense of who he was as a composer, teacher, and human being. Another Reed alum and MSU faculty colleague, composer Jere Hutcheson, who actually knew Reed even longer than Ruggiero, has contributed some additional comments herein as well. —FJO]

*

Charles Ruggiero and H. Owen Reed

Charles Ruggiero and H. Owen Reed at Blue Lake Fine Arts Camp

I first learned of Michigan State University’s music program circa 1966 when I participated in the Villanova Jazz Festival as the drummer for the New England Conservatory’s jazz band. Supplemented by a lead trumpet player ringer from the Berklee College of Music, our band played well at Villanova, but we weren’t able to stay at the festival very long, so we didn’t hear many performances by other bands. On the long bus ride back to Boston, several NEC band members expressed optimism about our chances of winning the award for the best big band. However, the next day our faculty advisor told us that although we had played very well, the Conservatory’s band hadn’t been awarded the first-, second-, or even third-place award. The winning big band at Villanova that year was the MSU Jazz Ensemble. A few years later, when I decided to pursue a Ph.D., I placed Michigan State near the top of my short list, since in addition to having a strong doctoral composition program, MSU also offered excellent jazz performance opportunities and advanced courses in jazz arranging—just the curricular combination I was hoping to find!
Five of the six graduate programs I had applied to communicated with me mostly by mail, but H. Owen Reed personally called me several times while I was making my decision about where I would pursue my graduate degrees. He answered all the questions I had about MSU, the University’s composition program, the Lansing area, and the State of Michigan. Neither my wife, Pat, nor I had ever been to Michigan. We both were New Englanders who had been brought up in Connecticut and had spent much time vacationing in the mountains of New Hampshire. From our study of maps, Pat and I discovered that there were no mountains anywhere near Lansing, Michigan, and we were concerned that mid-Michigan might be a rather dull and foreign-looking place to live.

Dr. Reed (to signal my respect, I always addressed him that way), who had spent some time in Massachusetts, assured us that Michigan was a wonderful place to live. He told us that in the UP (which we eventually figured out meant a place many hours away from Lansing, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan) there were some small but beautiful mountains and that in the Lower Peninsula there were lots of hilly areas similar to those found throughout the lower New England states. That sounded good to us. But what Dr. Reed told us about Michigan hills and mountains turned out not to be completely true. There are no mountains in Michigan that are even remotely similar to those found in New Hampshire, and real hills, like those one frequently encounters on bicycle rides in New England, are extremely hard to find! But Dr. Reed’s sales pitch wasn’t all bunk; we discovered after living in the Lansing area for several years, that Michigan, at least large chunks of it, are indeed quite beautiful.

When I told Dr. Reed that another Big Ten university had offered me a good paying half-time assistantship to teach percussion but that I wanted to focus more on composition and music theory and to study with him, it took him only a few days to call me back and offer me two assistantships, one in music theory and one working at WKAR-TV. I was delighted and honored that Dr. Reed had done this; it suggested not only that he really wanted me to come to MSU but also that he was proactive and capable of making things happen quickly even in an institution as large, complex, and often slow-moving as a Big Ten university.
It’s still not clear to me why Dr. Reed so actively recruited me. He always was supportive of me as a composer, in a general way, but at least early on in our relationship I think he was more impressed with my work as a percussionist than as a composer. Included with my application portfolio of compositions were recordings of me playing both one of my works for vibraphone and voice and a transcription for marimba of Chopin’s Fantaisie-Impromptu in C-sharp minor. Scoring for Percussion, an innovative and useful text written by Dr. Reed and Joel T. Leach was published in 1969, and in 1971 Dr. Reed still was strongly interested in all things percussive! Perhaps he was impressed by my recording of the Chopin and the fact that I was the percussion instructor at the University of Bridgeport in Connecticut, or, more likely, my credentials as a jazz drummer swayed him.

My 1971 MSU application included a very brief letter of recommendation written by John Mehegan. In the year before moving to Michigan, I had studied jazz theory and improvisation with Mehegan and then had become a member of his Connecticut-based jazz trio. (For his New York gigs, Mehegan used Art Blakey and other NYC-based drummers.) Mehegan was also a prominent jazz theorist, pianist, and critic (writing for Down Beat, the New York Herald Tribune, and other publications) who taught jazz improvisation at such prestigious schools as Julliard and Yale University as well as at Tanglewood in Massachusetts. From the 1940s on, Mehegan was at times very closely associated with Leonard Bernstein. H. Owen Reed had worked with Bernstein at Tanglewood in the early 1940s and may have been aware of Mehegan’s relationship with Bernstein. In any case, I was very pleased that Dr. Reed had accepted me into his composition studio, even if it was largely because of my work as a jazz drummer with Mehegan’s trio.

(From Dr. Reed’s earliest musical experiences as a Missouri boy studying piano—just after the peak of the ragtime craze and the emergence of stride piano—to his college days when he played trumpet in dance bands, to his years playing piano as a member of MSU’s Geriatric Six faculty jazz group during the last decade of his teaching career, he was inspired by jazz and thoroughly enjoyed performing it to the best of his abilities. He never claimed to be a great improviser or to possess extraordinary instrumental technique, but he surely did enjoy playing jazz, especially when surrounded by friends.)

*

I arrived in East Lansing in the summer of 1971 with great expectations about my studies as an MSU graduate composition major, but I soon was surprised and quite disappointed to discover that MSU’s jazz program had gone into a state of rapid entropy. The program had been founded in 1960 by Dr. Gene Hall (who had established the first degree-granting jazz program in the United States at North Texas State Teachers College) and had quickly developed into one of the best in the nation, led by such talented graduate assistants as George West and Bob Curnow, but by 1971, MSU’s jazz program was essentially leaderless and in shambles. On the other hand, I found studying with Dr. Reed to be a very positive experience. And I learned much from my work as a music theory teaching assistant and as a score reader and producer’s assistant at WKAR-TV, MSU’s public television station, which back then produced new 30-minute classical music shows every two weeks or so.

Some Additional Memories from
Jere Hutcheson

Owen and I remained close friends from the time I arrived at Michigan State University in 1963. I had chosen MSU for my doctoral study because of Owen’s reputation. In a sense, our relationship went back further than that. Both Owen and I had earned our MM degrees at Louisiana State, and in both cases Helen Gunderson was our major composition teacher. Owen was Gunderson’s first student with a graduate degree in composition, and I was her last. Gunderson spoke of Owen often, and she encouraged several of her students to apply to MSU’s doctoral composition program.

Owen was a natural-born leader. When a newly appointed director of MSU’s music department passed away suddenly, Owen was elected to complete the year as interim director. He was active in the Music Teachers National Association (MTNA), serving as chairman of its theory-composition section. When MSU was preparing to celebrate its centennial year, Owen was selected to compose an opera to commemorate the anniversary: thus sprang Michigan Dream. Owen was active on the faculty council that conceived and built the University Club. I suspect that his experience as the leader of his own jazz combos during his college days is where this quality for leadership began.

What do I owe to Owen Reed as a teacher? Owen was meticulous in matters of score preparation. This was especially important when composing for large ensembles, especially orchestra and band. He was also very knowledgeable in the area of percussion instruments, their special uses and notations.

Owen’s music had integrity. I never felt that there was any fluff there; every note was important. All of us who studied with him gained from his musical insight and from the integrity of his thinking.

There were other talented composers on MSU’s faculty in the early ’70s, including James Niblock and Jere Hutcheson, but Dr. Reed was the recognized leader of the composition area. He made all of the major decisions about the area’s admissions and degree programs, and he taught all or almost all of the graduate majors. When classes were in session, every Thursday from 3 to 5 in the afternoon, Dr. Reed held his seminars for composition majors in his large office on the fourth floor of the Music Practice Building, an office that was part of a two-room studio suite designed built for his exclusive use. By the 1970s, he was well connected in the field of composition, so there was a steady stream of established composers who presented their music and ideas about composition to his seminars. Most of these sessions were relaxed, somewhat informal, unscripted, and generally practical in nature; rarely did Dr. Reed or his guests talk about aesthetics, complex analytical systems, or other “erudite subjects.”

Although H. Owen Reed had written college-level textbooks on various aspects of “basic” music theory in the 1950s and ’60s, during my years of study with him, Dr. Reed very rarely discussed matters of tonal or atonal theory with me. Maybe by the ’70s he had decided that MSU students should study these topics with other members of the faculty. Or perhaps his then intense interest in percussion and notation, and his desire to focus his students’ attention on these topics, especially notation, left little lesson time for other things to be explored.

I thought my studies with Dr. Reed would be similar to the composition lessons I had taken at New England Conservatory, where normally each week I got a short assignment designed to help me develop specific techniques (mostly traditional contrapuntal and motivic variation techniques), but it turned out that most of my lessons with Dr. Reed were quite different. I had hoped Dr. Reed would help me better understand pitch structures in 20th-century music, explore new concepts of musical form, write more effectively for large ensembles, etc. Instead, for most of my lessons, Dr. Reed simply would have me show him what I had been working on during the past week, and then he would comment on, make suggestions for changes in, and ask questions about what I had written. Often, he would offer some praise and encouragement early in the lesson and then give me some advice on changes I might consider making. Sometimes, he would show me music he was composing, arranging, or notating at the time, pointing out details in his scores illustrating things he thought, perhaps, I should consider using in my music. Often, he would talk about various other things that were on his mind, not just music topics, but a recurring “theme” of my lessons with Dr. Reed was notation—all aspects of notation, including how to produce scores using a particular type of transparent film (large quantities of which Dr. Reed purchased with grant money) that he had recently adopted in place of traditional onionskin music paper—this was, of course, before most people had easy access to photocopiers and personal computers, both of which technologies have radically changed the way music is composed, notated, printed, and distributed.

In the early 1970s, Dr. Reed and many other members of the MSU community of composers were much interested in the latest music of George Crumb and other younger members of the art music avant-garde. Most of the things that fascinated us about such works as Crumb’s Ancient Voices of Children (1970), Songs, Drones and Refrains of Death (1971), Lux Aeterna for Five Masked Musicians (1972), and Vox Balaenae for Three Masked Players (1972), were at least partly notational in nature. It’s not by coincidence that all four of these Crumb works were published as facsimiles of the composer’s handwritten manuscripts. Traditional music notation, especially when typeset, simply wasn’t a flexible or rich enough symbolic language to express Crumb’s musical conceptions in meaningful, accurate, detailed, and performer-friendly ways.
Led by Dr. Reed, many MSU graduate composers were interested in finding ways to: specify indeterminate pitches and rhythms in our scores; clearly notate passages in which freer rhythms and arhythmic materials are combined with more traditionally notated rhythms; graphically represent the textures of our music more clearly than was possible using only traditional notation; notate “special” or “extended” instrumental techniques in coherent ways; provide performers with helpful markings and instructions that would increase the likelihood of having our music played well; etc. This was interesting stuff, to be sure, but scouring recent scores for innovative notations and figuring out the best ways of using the new film transparencies became almost an obsession for some of us at the time.

Although to this day I wish Dr. Reed had given me at least some technical exercises during my composition studies with him, over the years, as a composition teacher myself, I’ve come to a better understanding and appreciation of Dr. Reed’s composition pedagogy. With me, instead of following a pre-determined study plan, Dr. Reed dealt with issues as they arose in my writing, and while this didn’t allow for systematic development of compositional technique, other than notational technique, it did allow Dr. Reed to focus my attention on several very important matters. I think Dr. Reed’s game plan was to encourage me, primarily through focused praise of whatever kinds of music I wanted to compose, gradually building my trust in his judgment to the point where he could then make very critical comments about my work that I would take seriously but which would not discourage me from composing. I feel that this approach works well with many young composition students.

*

Like most teachers, H. Owen Reed had his “pet theories” and recommended practices that he reinforced by repetition. One of these was something I call prescriptive theory of compensating parameters. I can’t remember his own name for it. Anyway, his theory stipulated that when one or more parameters (melody and harmony, for example) become more complex, other parameters (perhaps rhythm and texture) should become less complex. When applied simplistically or rigidly, this idea becomes little more than a bromide, but I’ve come to appreciate its value. Although Dr. Reed’s theory of compensating parameters ran somewhat counter to the maximalist ideas of mid-20th-century composers like Milton Babbitt, at its core it reflected Dr. Reed’s profound understanding of what, how much, and how rapidly the human ear and brain can process music.
H. Owen Reed was a master communicator. I believe he was capable of holding at least a 15-minute conversation with just about any English-speaking person, regardless of that individual’s background, education, occupation, etc., at the end of which the other person quite likely would be thinking: “What a nice guy he is!” As host of his annual end-of-year party for his students at his Okemos home, Dr. Reed would charm all the young spouses of his male students, emphasizing his Missouri accent and turning on his genuine Southern charm. The next day, though, he could be perfectly at ease exchanging ribald limericks with some old colleagues. And when serious decisions had to be made, Dr. Reed could be quite businesslike, analytical, and ready and able to express his views as forcefully as necessary to make his points.

One of the things I learned from Dr. Reed is that there are times and contexts when it’s appropriate to discuss almost any topic, and other times and contexts when it is completely inappropriate to discuss almost anything. I remember being backstage with Dr. Reed at MSU’s Fairchild Theatre after a recital by Paul Zukofsky and Gilbert Kalish, during which they played the Ravel Sonata for Violin and Piano. On the other side of the stage one older member of the MSU string faculty was rather vehemently expressing to Zukofsky his disapproval of the inclusion of the Ravel sonata on the program because of its use of jazz and blues elements. Overhearing these comments, astonished and embarrassed, I intended to express my very different opinion of the Ravel sonata, and started to walk to the other side of the stage. But before I had taken two steps, H. Owen Reed grabbed me with one hand and locked my arm with his other arm, so that I couldn’t move. Although I hadn’t told him of my intentions, Dr. Reed had read my mind, and had determined that this was neither the time nor place for me to express my support of jazz in the concert hall!

Another time, many years later, after a concert in his honor at Blue Lake Fine Arts Camp in Michigan, many people, including some of the students who had just played his music, surrounded the famous ancient composer, telling him how much they enjoyed his compositions, how great he looked, how excited and honored they were to meet him and speak with him, etc. Dr. Reed smiled at each person he spoke with and told all of the student performers how beautifully they played his music and how much he enjoyed the program. After the crowd of Reed admirers dispersed, I paid my respects to my former teacher. We had a nice chat, some pictures were taken of the two of us, etc. Then I asked Dr. Reed if he enjoyed the performances of his music that he had just heard. The smile on his face straightened, he moved closer to me, and in a very serious soft voice he told me that his hearing had deteriorated so much that listening to live performances of his music was literally painful because of the consistently loud distortion of the high frequencies he had to contend with whenever he heard even moderately loud music.

Unquestionably the most important thing I took away from my composition lessons with H. Owen Reed was to have the courage and good sense to write the kind of music that I really want to write. Early on in my studies with Dr. Reed, I was struggling with an orchestra piece. I thought that I had a “good concept” for the work, but I had spent many hours working on it with relatively little music to show for all my time and efforts. The piece was consistently atonal, texturally dense, and rhythmically complex with no clear metric framework. At one of my composition lessons around the middle of the term, after he had noticed my lack of progress with the orchestra piece for several weeks, Dr. Reed studied my current draft of the score for a minute or two and then asked me why I hadn’t incorporated any jazz elements into the music I had brought to my lessons. I was stunned. He knew I was active as a jazz performer and arranger, and I knew that he was a true jazz enthusiast, but my composition lessons at New England Conservatory and my sense of what kinds of music graduate composition majors were “supposed to write” hadn’t allowed me to draw upon jazz in my “serious” compositions. Dr. Reed’s question opened the creative floodgates for me and helped me decide on the direction I would take as an artist for the rest of my life—a path that would take some courage but would allow me to speak with my own voice as a composer. That one lesson was worth the price of four years of MSU composition credits.

*

I’m sure that Dr. Reed had definite opinions about the music and careers of at least a few dozen of his former students, but when speaking with me, he always was a diplomat par excellence. In the 1970s and ’80s, I heard him cite the accomplishments of several of his former students enough times to conclude that he felt all of them were among a select group; the former students he mentioned most often to me were (in alphabetical order), Dinos Constantinides, Adolphus Hailstork, Jere Hutcheson, David Maslanka, and Bill Penn. I’m pretty sure Dr. Reed did not like their compositions (or those of any other of his students) as much as he admired some of the music of one of his teachers, Howard Hanson, but he certainly considered all five of these composers major talents. I find it interesting that I don’t have even the slightest hint about which of his former students Dr. Reed might have thought was the “best” or “most successful” composer. In the nearly 45 years I knew him, I can’t remember a single comment Dr. Reed made to me or to anyone else¬ that could be interpreted to suggest he felt any of his students was a better or more successful composer than any other of his many talented musical disciples—except, perhaps, for comments he made freely and frequently about one of his former students who attended MSU in the early 1950s.

If there was one student whom H. Owen Reed was the most proud of and whose music he liked the most, it probably was the jazz composer, arranger, pianist, bandleader, and Latin-jazz Grammy Award winner Clare Fischer (1928-2012). Typically, whether he was telling me about Clare Fischer’s days as an MSU music major, about Fischer’s latest jazz recording, or about Fischer’s arranging work for some pop-music superstar, subtle changes in Dr. Reed’s tone of voice and body language suggested to me that he felt Clare Fischer was unique among his students, a one-of-a-kind genius who had both exceptional musical skills and wide-ranging professional accomplishments that were unlike those of any of his other former students.

However, if Dr. Reed could have read the previous paragraph and if I could have asked him about it, I’m sure he would have said something like: “No, I don’t think what you’ve written is correct. Clare was a fine arranger and a fine composer, but I wouldn’t say he was a better composer than David or Jere, etc. And Clare’s greatest accomplishments were in jazz and popular music….” I’m sure Dr. Reed would have fine-tuned his diplomatic response so that it would have pleased (or at least not displeased) any former student mentioned.

Always Something New—Remembering Yusef Lateef (1920-2013)


Yusef Lateef and Adam Rudolph live in Milan 2012

Anyone reading this most likely already knows about the unique and deep beauty of Yusef Lateef’s sound. As with all the great musicians, we can recognize him upon hearing the first note. Yusef always said, “The tradition is to have your own sound.” And in fact the Dogon people of Mali have a word, “mi”, which describes the inner spirit of a person expressed though the voice of a musical instrument. When we hear Yusef play, we hear him always playing from the heart. I have witnessed both audience and performers moved to tears by his flute playing. I have heard Yusef play the entire history of the tenor saxophone in one solo. Always the story was deep, more than nine decades of life experience coming through—clear and beautiful. Look and listen: imagination, knowledge, and heartfelt expression are the guiding principles of real freedom.

Yusef Lateef in 2002.

Yusef Lateef in 2002. Photo by Kevin Ramos, courtesy Adam Rudolph.

I first met Brother Yusef in the summer of 1988 when I was living in Don Cherry’s loft on Long Island City, New York. We rehearsed there for a concert of Yusef’s with our group Eternal Wind (myself on hand drums and percussion, Charles Moore, Ralph Jones and Federico Ramos) plus Cecil McBee on bass. I was honored when Yusef asked me to bring my compositions for us to perform; in rehearsal he approached them with real interest and respect. That concert, produced by the World Music Institute, took place at Symphony Space in New York. Yusef had written all new music specifically for the occasion. I realize now that this was how he worked: every performance he did was always all new music. In the ensuing 25 years, Yusef and I performed and collaborated worldwide in many contexts: quartets, octets, with orchestras, and, most often in the last two decades, as a duo. He always brought new music and new creative processes and concepts to each concert and recording date. Yusef said, “With each project I try to do something I have never done before.” I have often reflected upon this; one of many seeds of wisdom that Yusef generously shared. For me, it suggests the idea of three qualities that I value deeply and which I saw Yusef embody in his life and work: creative imagination, studiousness and courage. A couple of personal experiences come to mind that illustrate these characteristics.

Yusef Lateef and Adam Rudolph: Formative Impulses (2003)

In 1995, when Yusef and I were discussing how to approach our second compositional collaboration The World at Peace for 12 musicians, Yusef suggested that for two of the movements I write for half of the instruments, telling him only which instruments I had written for, the tempo and how many bars it was. He would then compose, without seeing my music, for the other six musicians. At the same time, he would compose two other pieces, sending me only which six instruments he had chosen, the tempo and how many bars. So it also became my task to compose for the other six musicians without having seen what he had written. This seemed to me a brilliant and original idea. When we heard the combined music’s in rehearsal, we decided that three out of the four compositions worked, in that they sounded unlike any music we had ever heard before, while serving our expressive intentions.

Adam Rudolph and Yusef Lateef in 1996

Adam Rudolph and Yusef Lateef in 1996

Several years later, Yusef was asked by the Interpretations series to create an evening of music to celebrate his 80th year in a concert at Alice Tully Hall. In addition to asking me to compose some new music for this octet project, Yusef’s new idea was that we co-compose several pieces in a formula of writing alternating bars for the entire ensemble. For example, I would write the first five bars, he would write the next nine bars, I would write the next seven, and so on. The results were surprising, fresh and beautiful, and worthy of inclusion in the concert and the subsequent recording. On both of these occasions, I was inspired by Yusef’s courage and willingness to try completely new and unproven processes even in a major concert setting. And as I reflect upon it now, I wonder – how did Yusef think of these ideas in the first place? Yusef seemed to have no bottom to his wellspring of creative ideas, as anyone who has worked with him will attest.

The first recording I heard of Yusef’s was one of his early forays into an expanded western “classical” orchestration. As a fourteen-year-old growing up on the south side of Chicago, I was excited to be discovering both live and recorded music. I often raided my father’s vast record collection. The Centaur and the Phoenix thus found a regular rotation on my turntable and it still sounds fresh today. When I once asked Yusef about that recording, he told me he wanted to move beyond the codified instrumentation and harmonic materials prevalent at that time and “try something new.”

This amazing inventiveness seems to have always been in Yusef’s character. In the mid-1950s, he was one of the first improvising artists to embrace Middle Eastern and Eastern modes, rhythms, and instruments into his music. When asked about this, he told me that he wanted to have a long career creating music and to do so he would have to study as much about all kinds of music as possible in order to be able to vary his musical palette. Again, words to live by for the serious musician.

Yusef’s art traveled in higher dimensions, transcending medium or style. His telescope of intuition ranged far into deep space, towards new galaxies of thought and musical processes. He often referred to us as “musical evolutionists.” In speaking about his process he said: “When you get rid of one thing you have to replace it with something else.” As I see it, this means first having the courage to abandon something one may have invested years in developing. (In Yusef’s case, that was the harmonic structures that he and Barry Harris refined throughout the 1950s.) Then one must have the imagination to think of a genuinely new approach rooted in a foundation of musical substance and experience. This is no small task. Yusef’s amazingly diverse and inventive musical output of his last 25 years is testimony to his words. In 1985, following his return from four years of teaching, studying and performing in Nigeria, Yusef embarked on a new phase of his creative life. The way Yusef’s music opened up and expanded reminds me of his good friend and fellow evolutionist John Coltrane’s last years. In fact Yusef often quoted one of Coltrane’s favorite sayings: “Knowledge will set you free.”

As I see it, Yusef was a prototype of the modern renaissance artist. He refused to let any outside force define him or his activities. In addition to his compositions that have become central to the contemporary improvisers repertoire of “standards,” Yusef composed dozens of pieces for piano, chamber groups, choirs, and orchestras. He invented and built new musical instruments, carved bamboo flutes, taught scores of students, and published dozens of musical pedagogical studies (of which The Repository of Musical Scales and Patterns stands as one of the most important music reference books of the last 50 years). And this creative outpouring was not limited to music alone. In addition to earning his Doctorate in Education, Yusef painted and wrote two novels, Night in the Garden of Love and Another Avenue (which he made into an opera). He wrote several books of poetry, plays, and numerous articles on subjects ranging from Lester Young and Charlie Parker to Confucius and Martin Buber.

In 1992 Yusef started YAL records, which released over 36 recordings of what he called “Autophysiopsychic” music. He used this term to describe his music, which means “music coming from the physical, spiritual and mental self.” Over the years Yusef asked me to contribute my percussion, electronics, and arrangements to 18 of these recordings. He inspired me to start my own Meta records label and our two labels co-released several collaborative projects including Voice Prints (2013), Towards the Unknown (2010), In the Garden (2003), Beyond the Sky (2001) and The World at Peace (1997). Yusef was a great motivator: he made me aspire to realize my own creative potential. This is a gift I believe he has given to many.

Muhal, Ornette, Yusef, and Adam

Muhal Richard Abrams, Ornette Coleman, Yusef Lateef, and Adam Rudolph at the NEA Jazz Masters Awards Ceremony in 2010. Photo courtesy Adam Rudolph.

Yusef, like all great artists, was never afraid of what others thought. He dedicated himself to following his own muse, cultivating his imagination with lifelong study and fearless experimentation. Although Yusef’s music had deep roots, he never wanted to recreate his past music. He always chose to make music that expressed what interested him in the present moment in his life. In 2010, when Yusef was awarded the NEA “Jazz Masters” award, they asked him to perform one of his older pieces with the Lincoln Center Big Band at the ceremony. Yusef informed them that his older music was not “where he was at” creatively any more. I was honored when a few days later he called and asked me to perform in duet with him for his portion of the evening’s events. The night of the awards Yusef and I stepped on stage following a rousing piece played by the Lincoln Center Big Band. After some moments of silence Yusef blew a solitary note on his bamboo flute. You could hear a pin drop—Yusef had (yet again) brought magic into the house. We continued with Tibetan bells, then moved to the blues via tenor saxophone and hand drums (accompanied by an electronic music tape that Yusef had created), then on into our piano and flute duet. Finally I played the didgeridoo while Yusef sang his rendition of the slave song “Brother Hold Your Light” (I want to get to the other side). Perhaps there had been some in attendance who initially wished to hear Yusef go back and revisit his music of the past. But Yusef wanted to present the person he was, who we were, at that place, at that time—in the moment of the now. Yusef received the standing ovation he richly deserved by an audience that included many of his peers. It was a great evening, and one I shall never forget.

Yusef & Adam at Roulette in 2013

Adam Rudolph and Yusef Lateef shake hands at the end of their concert at Roulette in April 2013, photo by C. Daniel Dawson.

In the fall of 2012 we did our last European tour around Yusef’s 92nd birthday, and in April of 2013 we played our last duet concert at Roulette in New York. Both in his playing and composing Brother Yusef continued to stay creative up to the very end. Only days before his passing he told me about new intervallic ideas he was developing. He sent his fourth symphony to the copyist only a couple months ago. This past October Yusef brought his sound and spirit to a concert of Go: Organic Orchestra at the Athenaeum in Hartford. It was his last public performance.


Adam Rudolph’s Aminita: Yusef Lateef with the Go: Organic Orchestra, recorded live in concert at The Electric Lodge in Venice, CA (2003).

Brother Yusef will continue to be an inspiration to many of us. I consider him to be my most important teacher, not only of music, but also of how to live as an artist and a human being. Over the years he became a true and dear friend. Anyone who spent time with Brother Yusef will testify to his kind and gentle nature. He radiated peace and love. He was a luminous being. To put it another way, as Yusef himself said recently, “Brother Adam, have you noticed the leaves waving to you? It’s okay to wave back.”


Adam Rudolph’s Morphic Resonance featuring Yusef Lateef with the Go: Organic Orchestra, also from the 2003 performance at The Electric Lodge.

Henri Lazarof (1932-2013), Who Dominated My Life for Six Years

Henri Lazarof

Henri Lazarof, photo courtesy Theodore Presser Company

Nobody but members of my family have ever held such a prominent place in my life for such a long period of time as Henri Lazarof. It was 1964, now 50 years ago, late in my second year at UCLA and my first year as a music major. I was studying harmony with a very ordinary professor, who shall remain nameless; it turned out he only lasted about another year at the university anyway. I had already met my future wife, Dolly, who was in Lazarof’s harmony class. She told me that I needed to change teachers, that something extraordinary was going on there, in spite of the fact that she occasionally came out of the class in tears. Her first semester class had begun with thirty students; it ended with eight. Lazarof was brutal, demanding total commitment, but they were really learning something.

When I talked to Lazarof about transferring into his class, he made a typically sarcastic comment to the effect that it was because I wanted to be with my girlfriend. He also informed me that I had better be at a very high level if I was to join the class in the second year. My first day in his class, he devoted the entire hour to testing me, mostly musicianship skills, in front of the rest of the class. At the end of the session, he told me I could stay. Good thing.

He absolutely drove us all to our individual limits. After harmony, I was with him for pretty much every other important course I took. After I graduated, he saw to it that I received a full fellowship to continue through to my doctorate, always completely under his mentorship.

During those six years, I saw him occasionally reduce grown men to tears. He certainly left a wake of students dropping his courses in favor of easier professors. To be one of the few still standing at the end was quite a source of personal satisfaction.
He believed in working very hard to develop the tools a composer needs. For example, he knew every instrument inside and out, and insisted that we all learn them at least as well. It was difficult to argue with such an approach. During my years of intensive work with him, he served as my main source of knowledge and inspiration, and as a role model. He lived what he taught.
For several years after my period of study, whenever I wrote something I would always think, “What would Lazarof say about this?” After some years, though, when my own individual style finally took over, I no longer wanted his approval, and we were less and less in contact, though always occasionally in touch. In 1982, Dolly and I hosted a surprise fiftieth birthday celebration for him, our co-conspirator being his colleague and our “other” mentor, Robert Tusler (who is still doing well at age 93!).
Unfortunately, Lazarof’s later years went from unhappy to tragic. He was never a collaborator. He never joined any of the usual composers’ organizations—in fact, he purposely avoided them. This did not exactly endear him to other composers. He increasingly went his own way, without much interaction with the rest of the composition world.

Then came something much more serious: Alzheimer’s. At a concert celebrating his 75th birthday, he didn’t even recognize me. At that time, I didn’t know of his affliction, and it obviously upset me. When I came to know the reason, I felt both better and worse. It was complicated. We were only occasionally in touch after that, and it was increasingly difficult.

Almost a year ago, someone close to him caught me after one of my lectures for the LA Philharmonic, telling me that Lazarof’s condition had deteriorated to a child-like existence. That such a spirit, such an intellect, could be thus reduced was devastating. I can only hope that his last year was peaceful. He was truly an amazing musician and teacher.

*
 

Henri Lazarof’s Musical Lineage and Legacy
Muzio Clementi (1752-1832)

John Field (1782-1837)

Mikhail Glinka (1804-1857) and Alexander Dubuque (1812-1898)
(Glinka studied very briefly with Field; Dubuque studied extensively with Field)

Mily Balakirev (1837-1910)
(Balakirev studied informally with Glinka, but more with Dubuque)

Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov (1844-1908)

Ottorino Respighi (1879-1936)

Fernando Germani (1906-1998)

Goffredo Petrassi (1904-2003)

Henri Lazarof (1932-2013)
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Edward Applebaum, Stephen Beck, Don Davis, Brad Ellis, Burton Goldstein, David Evan Jones,
Daniel Kessner, David Lang, Ellsworth Milburn (1938-2007), Mark E. Wilson

Remembering Jim Hall (1930-2013)

Guitarist Jim Hall at the Village Vanguard, New York, NY

Guitarist Jim Hall at the Village Vanguard, New York, NY. Photo © by David Korchin.

Jim Hall has left behind some of history’s finest art, and is to be loved deeply. His memory will bring joy, not sorrow, for what he’s left us shall always mark greatness, as well as a precious map for many others to follow. Bravo Jim Hall!

—Pat Martino

In 1995, three of my students were graduating from LaGuardia High School in New York City. LaGuardia is one of the finest schools in the country for high school students who want to study the arts. Many of the graduates have gone on to become professional musicians, actors, dancers, and visual artists. As a graduation gift for these talented young players, I decided to take them to the Village Vanguard to hear and meet Jim Hall. Why would I do that? I knew Jim would be very receptive to meeting them and he was—as always—friendly, gracious, and very happy to take the time to say hello and talk to them.

Of the many guitarists I’ve seen or heard, Jim was constantly evolving. In 1995, Jim was 65 years old—five years younger than I am now, but to me, then and now, his age meant nothing, but his music meant everything.

I first met Jim in 1968. Oddly enough it was because of guitarist Chuck Wayne. Bassist George Cebra told me about jam sessions that were happening in Brooklyn every Tuesday night. Guitarist Louis Sossa owned a dress factory where he ran these jam sessions, which consisted of guitarists getting a chance to play with Chuck Wayne. The sessions would last till 4:00 a.m. The first time I went there, I just sat and listened, stunned by the number of guitarists who could really play and, particularly, how amazing Chuck was. But the one thing that got to me was the idolization of Chuck; everyone spoke as if he was the only jazz guitarist in the world. Sometimes I would say to the disdain of others, “What about Jim Hall? He’s different from anyone around; he’s not a bopper but a modern player, which is much hipper.” Frown, frown, and frown!

I finally sat in one night. I distinctly remember we played “I’ll Remember April.” When it was my turn to solo, I got so nervous that my left hand started to shake and I could hardly play. I was frozen. When it was over, I was so embarrassed that I left immediately and never went back. I couldn’t believe that I reacted

that way. I went into a deep depression that lasted for a while. I tried to practice my way out of it, but that wasn’t working. I knew I had to do something, but what? I needed to get over the fear of playing with well-known or famous musicians. Since I loved the way Jim Hall played and I knew he lived in New York, I found his number and called him to set up a time for a lesson.
It was a Saturday afternoon. Jim greeted me at the door. The first thing I noticed was he wasn’t as tall as I had imagined. I took out my guitar and we sat down and talked. The first thing he asked— which is the first thing I ask advanced students—was, “Why are you here?” I didn’t tell him about the Chuck Wayne incident, but instead I told him I was having trouble with very fast tempos, which was true. He called a tune and we played. The thing I loved about him was how relaxed he made me feel. There was no ego there, no “look how great I am.” He was genuinely there to help me. He showed me some improv exercises to work on and we agreed that I only needed to see him once a month. I walked away feeling good. I was totally relaxed when we played together.
Once a month I would show up and we would play. Jim would comment on my improv, but in a constructive way, which I appreciated. The one observation he made about me, which I’ll always remember was, “Do you have to play so many notes?” And I replied, “Yes.” I know he was trying to slow me down and play more meaningfully, which I understood, but I was trying to get to the same place that Coltrane was. Many would argue that on guitar it doesn’t work, but I truly believe it can be done.
The last and sixth lesson was the best thing for my ego. We played “On Green Dolphin Street” with a killer tempo. When we finished Jim looked at me and said, “We’re done. You don’t need to come back. You keep playing like that and you’ll be fine.
If it were someone else, I probably would have spent a fortune and not gotten better at all. That was Jim. He gave you just what you needed and that has been his approach to his improvisations: just the right amount of notes, no more no less, played with impeccable style and a tone that leaves you wanting more and more.

When I first met Jim he wasn’t as busy as he would have liked to be. I know this because he would tell me he would start practicing for a gig a few weeks before to get ready, and he was always ready.

As the years progressed, I would stay in touch by visiting him at the Ed Sullivan Theatre where he and Chuck Wayne held down the guitar chairs for The Merv Griffin Show. Once I brought my first published book, A Guitarist’s Guide to Chord Substitution. He was very supportive and showed it to Chuck. I miss those days.

After The Merv Griffin Show ended in the mid-1980s, Jim became very busy, as did I, but we stayed in touch. When I signed to Blue Note he was very happy for me.

Later on in the ’80s after going through a divorce and moving to Manhattan, I went through a crisis of self worth, including my playing. I kept getting accused of playing too far out, but for me that was what I wanted to do. However, I also wanted to work. Jim was playing at the Blue Note one week. I sat at the bar and watched and listened to him play. I don’t remember much from that night except his version of “Blue Monk.” He took an inside-out approach and it was in his usual style, loose and spare. A light went off in my head and I knew what I had to do. I began in my own way to play inside out, and it was because of Jim. He has always been an inspiration to me.

When I started my own record company, the first release was Takin’ The Duke Out. I sent Jim a copy. I asked him if he wouldn’t mind giving me a quote to use. A few hours later he faxed me the quote that I have saved, “New York’s best-kept secret is finally getting out!” Over the years I kept Jim apprised of what I was doing by sending him each new release.

The last time I saw him was when he was awarded a fellowship at the NEA Jazz Masters event in 2004. As far as I was concerned, it was long overdue. After the event, press and fans surrounded him as he tried to make his way out of the huge hall. I was in the middle of the crowd and just waved to him. He stopped what he was doing, came over to me and said, “I am so proud of you.” I was so touched because he was the one being honored; it has stayed with me ever since.

After Jim had a back operation a few years ago, I would talk to him every few months to see how he was. I was so happy to know he became active again. A few weeks ago, I watched a video of him performing with Peter Bernstein. Although it was a treat to see and hear him, I was concerned. He didn’t look good and on his birthday I thought I would give him a call but, being busy, I forgot. A few days later he passed away. I never had a chance to say goodbye.

Jim was the epitome of a total musician. His musicality will be an inspiration to the thousands of guitarist who will come after. He made the world of jazz a better place for all of us.

The following is from Peter Bernstein, the last person Jim worked with:

He will be missed, but left us so much to learn from as a musician and person. He was such a thoughtful and empathetic person and these qualities were expressed with such beauty and individuality in his playing. His aesthetic was so unique in that it embodied meaning in every note… His subtlety, nuance, and great expression were his alone: a true original, identifiable from one of those well-chosen notes. Jim Hall was a poet who played the guitar.

I couldn’t have said it better. Goodbye, old friend. You will have a place in my heart forever.

***
Dom Minasi has been active in jazz for over 40 years as a composer, guitarist, producer, educator, author, and journalist. Highlights of his extensive discography include I Have the Feeling I’ve Been Here Before (Blue Note, 1975), Finishing Touches (CIMP, 1999) Takin’ The Duke Out (CDM Records, 2001), and Angel’s Dance (Nacht Records), an album of duets with pianist Michael Jefry Stevens released in November 2013.

Lou Reed Got Married and He Didn’t Invite Me

Lou Reed Stencil Art

Lou Reed stencil art seen in an alley near the 24th Street BART Station in San Francisco by Doctor Popular on Flickr

Lou Reed is dead. He died of complications from his problematic liver, an organ he famously abused for far too long. He subverted his self-destructive tendencies into a grand and glorious—and often confounding, annoying, and downright enraging—body of work. He influenced all that came after him. He changed music. He was music. He was unkind in his life but generous in his output. He was ferocious with his own sound, but errant about the way he sang his songs. He was dead for so long we thought he could never die.

But these are all clichés.

And starting again would only lead to more clichés.
They may be true (all clichés are true) but they do not honor. Because if there was ever an artist who resisted being dipped in amber and ossified into myth, it was Lou Reed, since he was, from the get-go, all myth, all pre-amber-dipped half-truths, all sincere monuments to insincerity. He leaves us, like all great personages, with a frustrating and gorgeously tantalizing set of unanswered questions that those who love his work and who are listening again since this terrible news came down will keep trying—and failing—to answer. And we love him madly for it.

Let’s start at the beginning, which is, when discussing this exact topic, a personal journey. I listened to the Velvet Underground, driving around in my car in Southern California, receiving missives from Planet New York, learning the most important fact about music, one I’d not known: that it can be dangerous. Not just aggressive and off the rails, but sweet in a way that feels about to pounce—the songs “Heroin” and “Venus in Furs” are terrifying like roller coasters; the song “Sunday Morning,” “There She Goes Again,” and “I’ll Be Your Mirror” are terrifying like actual murders. Aggressive sex and walk-on-the-wild-side drugs are nothing compared to the bizarre fripperies (warm guitar sound, strings, celesta) of Mr. Reed’s offering to reflect someone else. From there I got to know the solo records of this same frontman, including the then-new offering simply titled New York (a title he, above everyone else, earned on merit) and the older Street Hassle. Like so many—so many—others, I made some important decisions under the influence of these records. There was danger in those streets at night, and I too—too—was going down to that same legendary dirty boulevard.

I imagined long evenings with Lou Reed, talking (taking?) drugs, money, art, crime, grit, sex, love, abandonment, abuse, and fear. Like so many, Lou Reed had become my travelling companion and a drinking buddy, one I did not know, would not know, a friend I could probably never have because that person named Lou Reed did not actually exist—the Lou who screamed into the microphone and played his diamond-sounding guitar directly into my ear (or so I honestly believed) across a continent. My Lou Reed. Lou, I called him, ever the optimist. But then again, he did exist—I had a friend who was a nanny for a friend of his, with whom Lou Reed discussed pinball and the Zone Diet (both of which he knew a lot about). He appeared in the film of my friend Elizabeth Wurtzel’s book Prozac Nation. He came to hear another friend, Petra Haden, sing with his wife at The Stone. He sat near my wife (in her prior incarnation as someone else’s girlfriend) during a showing of In the Cut and laughed riotously at the tough-guy cop talk. He was there to hear Anne Carson read Stacks and Bracko; he was there to hear the Kronos Quartet. He was around. Which meant he was both real and not. Which is part of the Lou Reed magic—that completely inaccessible available celebrity Brooklyn kid from some distant planet right next door.

I grew up (not as much in public as I might have liked), loved Lou Reed throughout, and even made work from his on more than one occasion, pairing two lines from Lou’s liner notes from the Perfect Night Live in London CD with a chunk of text from Herbert Marcuese’s One Dimensional Man (reader, forgive me my pretensions—it was graduate school) and setting them for vocal quartet for a piece called New Forms of Control; and another deeper piece, a three-movement piano sonata called Down to You is Up, each movement addressing a specific Velvet Underground song in a different way. From this material, I extracted another piece, an expanded and orchestrated version of the first movement called, without apology, All Tomorrow’s Parties. It was what I could do to show my love—but it went beyond love, as most matters Lou Reed do, and verged into a kind of possession, an ownership, a one-way street annexation. This was unrequited love from a young man who knew quite well the vicissitudes of unrequited love both for Lou Reed and everyone else.

Lou Reed 2001

Lou Reed performing at the Hop Farm Music Festival on July 2, 2011 by Man Alive on Flickr.

I could bore you, as so many on social media are wont to do since his passing, with personal interactions— that time I had a piece played at The Kitchen and saw Lou was in the house, how nervous this made me, and how angry I was when I looked over to find the seat empty when it came time for my opening notes. I could tell you that story, but one incident sums it up. Years later when was walking down lower Broadway listening to The Blue Mask on a new iPod, I rounded the corner and who did I see walking toward me but Lou Reed. This kind of moment can only happen in New York—it happens so often here. But this was not a simple celebrity sighting, the kind to which we are rumored to be immune, but a kind of summoning, an invocation. Or at least that’s how I chose (and choose) to perceive it. You can’t change my mind about that.

That apocryphal statement about that first Velvet Underground LP—that it sold only 10,000 copies, but that every one of those 10,000 people went out and started a band—is the kind of thing that becomes a legend most. And while it can neither be proven nor disproven, it is the stuff that The Lou Reed Legend is built on. Because like the stories of all great artists, most of the story is built on a mountain of crucial untruth—a wispy chunk of magical thinking, a campfire story of how “downtown” got that way. We like our myths, our legends, and we fight hard to keep them. Lou, as I called him, wandered into this stacked self-presentation so completely that I believe he had to believe it. Or was he a great trickster, who sold us a bill of gorgeous goods so sincerely that we believed every word when much of it was simply the work of a poet, whose job is to observe, crystalize, and present, not relate facts. To cite one especially painful example, Lou did not really know Holly, Candy (she who “never lost her head, even when she was giving head”), Little Joe, Jackie, or the Sugar Plum Fairy, not well at any rate. These were delicate fictions to him, not his exploited subjects so much as his presented stand-in characters made musical flesh to tell a specific story in the most accessible way. Give a man a mask and he’ll tell you the truth. And in a way, Lou Reed is, was, and always has been as real and earthbound as Ziggy Stardust, which is why his death is so surprising. Because a fiction cannot die.
When, in the early ’90s, Reed and his former bandmate John Cale reunited to make Songs for Drella, it mattered to me as much as a (wholly impossible) reunion between Beatles. They did it to mourn the death of Andy Warhol (another fiction who had no business dying), and in that record they seemed to reveal a more human side of that whole Factory conflux cum clusterfuck. Lou, in the final and direct song, begged forgiveness of his former mentor, especially because (as rendered by Cale in his gorgeous Welsh-accented voice) in one extended reading of Warhol’s own words, it was revealed that at one point Lou Reed had gotten married and did not invite Mr. Warhol to the event. This is critical—or was to me as I drove long distances between coastal points listening to my store-bought Songs for Drella cassette—because here was Lou Reed the famous divine asshole meeting Lou Reed the person who could do something as quotidian as get married and come to terms with the humanity of his own shortcomings. He even sang the saddest words I’ve ever heard an artist sing to another: “Oh well now Andy/I guess I’ve got to go/I hope some way somehow/you liked this little show/I know it was late in coming, but it’s the only way I know/Goodnight Andy.” Tears stream as I retype these. Who knew someone like Andy Warhol needed such succor? Now those who knew his work well know that in songs like, say, “Baton Rouge,” Lou Reed wrote some of the more devastating and angry scenes from a marriage ever penned, and yet, this mention and addressing of this unresolved tension between these two is so devastatingly human, all too human, that it is hard not to be so invested. And yet, even as we hear these admissions, these faults formulated on a screen, Lou still, somehow, inscrutably, manages to keep a great distance.

Among Lou’s last public offerings is a review of Kanye West’s album Yeezus, and, like most things to do with Lou Reed, it used the subject as a mode of self-reference and putative revelation, contradiction and rare and important insight—which makes him nothing short of the perfect person to review this specific record. Of Kanye, he writes: “What he says and what he does are often two different things,” which is not only the wryly-obvious-yet-he-did-say-it profound but perhaps the most perspicacious piece of self-criticism he ever offered. After all, here was this man who wrote simple songs about heroin and complicated songs about Sunday morning; who was both down-and-dirty gritty and shimmer-shimmer glam; who barked while he sang yet obsessed over his sonics; who was, in the beginning, famously and publicly bisexual and promiscuous at that, and yet wrote some of the most profound songs about heterosexual (then the only kind allowed) marriage, divorce, and family life ever written; who lived in New York—who lived New York; who was New York—whose final record, Hudson River Wind Meditations, will forever be a perplexing and oddly satisfying glimpse into quietude. In short, he contained not only multitudes; he was a vast and often impenetrable store of impossible contradictions.

Not everything Lou Reed did worked magic. If you don’t believe me, listen to “The Original Wrapper” (and if you are still not persuaded, and are blessed with a surfeit of sangfroid, watch the video—though to be fair, it was the ’80s and post-facto forgiveness is often necessary). But here’s what always baffled me, and it is, in fact, the crux of Lou Reed: most of what he did should not have worked. His lyrics can be trite, his singing downright bad, his prosody bordering unethical, and yet, for whatever mystical reason, it works even when it doesn’t work. Yes, “cool” plays a factor in it, but to cite Lester Bangs, not having chops is not enough. Even at his least profound and braggy-clichéd (“I am a gift to all the women of the world”) or nursery-rhyme overly simplistic (“It’s such a perfect day/I’m glad I spent it with you” and “You scream/I scream/We all want egg cream”) to his the downright and often embarrassingly crude (the entire song “Sex With Your Parents” or the out-and-out bitter misogyny of “Baton Rouge”) it all works. And this is where Lou Reed helps those who love him glimpse the ineffable. Because this SoCal boy is now a longstanding New York transplant who managed the impossible: I met Lou Reed. And sure he was not warm, but whatever, he was there and so was I and I cannot have that taken away.

I am some kind of putative authority on matters musical, degree certified and having spent decades as a professional composer, and yet the above-mentioned songs, as easily as I can list their purported “flaws,” are among my favorites—I love them for their efficacy, for their content, their individuality, and for reasons I am incapable of explaining. And they are not guilty pleasures, not things I love because I loved the me I was when I heard them or whatever, not so-bad-they-have-to-be-good, but songs I consider a great part of a great oeuvre of a truly great artist. And for all the time I’ve spent trying to figure music out, for all the years I’ve spent listening to, playing, writing about and, above all, writing music, for all my degrees and publications and distinguished commissions and performances, I remain stumped as to why. And that, in a nutshell, is Lou Reed. Or at least my Lou Reed.
And so I, a mere mortal and alarmingly devoid of myth, have little choice but to collapse into cliché myself when speaking of what we’ve lost this past month when he who should simply not ever have died—or perhaps he who has been dead for so long and lived through it—admitted his mortality and denied us the records, poems, stories, and writings yet to come, dying, according to his wife Laurie Anderson, in the midst of a Tai Chi exercise in East Hampton, a place they loved much and visited often. He was a New Yorker who knew the value of quiet contemplation, and his passing is not only the “end of an era” (cliché) for the “Godfather of punk” (another cliché) but in fact the “death of rock and roll” (merciless and empty cliché) and hardly a “Perfect Day” (ugh, does it get worse than the spun lyric cliché). Because what needs to be said is beyond the reach of words, and when words fail we turn to music, and that is, honestly, what Lou left us.

I am inexplicably angry with you for dying, Lou Reed, because I take the denial of your future work personally because I took everything you did personally because for me like so many countless others you were our avatar, our canary in the urban coal mine, our living catharsis and great fear, a level whose lower rung we could only hope to scrape, a golem who ought to live forever. Because it is all personal—you not only taught me that, you taught me not to be afraid of it. So now, to cite you (because I always cite you, because I never will know you and cannot for the life of me explain in words or notes or deeds how much and how unwisely and how deeply I will probably always love you), you’ve sucked your lemon peel dry, so why not get high? Oh, woh, woh, something tells me that you’re really gone. You said we could be friends, but that’s not what’s not what I want. I know it is quick in coming, but it’s the only way I know.

Goodnight Lou.

End of the Road

Chuck Metcalf

Chuck Metcalf (photo courtesy Chez Hanny)

My last week on the road in San Francisco began with a rehearsal for pianist David Udolph’s tribute to bassist Chuck Metcalf (1931-2012) at Chez Hanny. I consider it an honor to be playing this concert. As I write this, I’m studying for the date by listening to several recordings of his music.

I first met Metcalf in 1973 at a jam session he was throwing in the basement of his house. I don’t remember exactly which part of San Francisco he lived in, but I remember that he used an unorthodox amplifier that was in the shape of a tube. I also remember how intensely he involved himself in playing the bass and that he didn’t go searching for notes to play, but simply played the notes that would work. He was a pretty busy bassist around the Bay Area at the time, so I had plenty of opportunities to listen to him play with local artists like Mel Ellison, Mel Martin, Jim Nichols, and Smith Dobson. For a while he shared the role of standard-bearer for the local jazz scene’s bass playing with James Leary, Ray Drummond, Chris Amberger, Bob Maize, and Mel Graves. The young players like Michael Formaneck, Kirby Lowe, and myself studied how they played and tried to build our own sound from it.

I was glad to see him in New York in the 1980s, playing with the likes of Dexter Gordon and Fred Hersch. It was around this time that I found out that he was also an architect. Although I never had the chance to talk a lot with Chuck, other than about basic music stuff and what kind of strings he used, I got to see him play quite a bit and I always liked his gear (like his weird amplifier). One item that especially caught my attention was his bass case. It was made of parachute material, tough but extremely lightweight. It turned out that his wife, Leila, made it. When she set up shop as an instrument case maker, I bought one for my five-string Ferdinand-Joseph Seitz bass. I still have the bass (although now it has six strings), but the case is long gone.
The last time Chuck played at Chez Hanny, it was with the group Udolph has reassembled with Steve Heckman on saxophone and Ron Maributo on drums, except for the addition of a vibraphonist, Jim Zimmerman. The last time I heard Chuck play in person, though, was at a jam session in 1981. It was a loft in New York’s Greenwich Village where pianist Fred Hersch and bassist Ed Felson lived. My apartment was a few blocks away and I kept my amplifier there (a much more orthodox, but rather large Ampeg V-6B). He had just finished his stint as Dexter Gordon’s bassist and was testing the waters of The Apple’s free-lance scene. His playing was in top form and I was expecting him to take the city by storm. But as circumstance would have it, he was also breaking up with Leila and would soon leave New York for Holland. I stayed abreast of his career through a grapevine of common associations, but only heard his playing on the recordings he made with saxophonist Bert Wilson.

Chuck Metcalf Album

Thinking of You, released in 2004, was Metcalf’s final album as a leader.

Metcalf’s playing is not as well documented as it could, and should, be—something that can probably be said of most musicians. Considering the amount of music he played and the respect he commanded by those who knew him, though, I find it odd that he is on less than twenty recordings. Still, Chuck took the initiative to record four albums as a leader: Live In Seattle (1987), Elsie Street (1990), Help Is Coming (1992), and Thinking of You (2004). Elsie Street inspired enough critical acclaim to help get Metcalf inducted into the Seattle Jazz Hall of Fame in 1991, but he gained little recognition outside of the Pacific Northwest and San Francisco. The last three albums serve as showcases for his compositions and reveal a reverence for the jazz tradition that principally informed his bass playing. In essence, Chuck Metcalf was a “bebopper” who was most comfortable playing over song-forms, although he also had an affinity for left-leaning political theories and was fond of playing free jazz and loved the music of Albert Ayler. But he was not the kind of bassist who felt at home playing in more popular dance-based genres like Latin music, funk, or rock ‘n’ roll, which could have been a contributing factor towards his not recording more often.

One aspect of Chuck Metcalf that made him stand out from his contemporaries was an egalitarian approach to music. He believed that what he played on the bass was as important to any musical situation he found himself in as what the people he accompanied were supplying. Although not everyone he played with concurred with his philosophy, it was understood by anyone who called on his services that Chuck would give his best effort on stage, that he would go the extra mile. Part of that effort included organizing sessions, gigs, and recording dates; in a word, Chuck was a leader. But he led from the back of the band, primarily as an accompanist, even if it meant that his considerable skills as a soloist might be overlooked. For this reason, his best work was done backing up great soloists, such as: Mark Murphy, Dexter Gordon, Mose Allison, Art Pepper, Anita O’Day, Bobby McFerrin, Joe Pass, Bob Dorough, Art Farmer, and lesser known masters like Mel Ellison, Mel Martin, and Smith Dobson. His behind-the-scenes attitude towards music making also expressed itself in an entrepreneurial bent that included co-founding the Seattle Jazz Society in 1966.

Metcalf was a contemporary of fellow Seattle-ites Ray Charles and Quincy Jones and his approach to making music harkens back to a time when jazz wasn’t as institutionalized as it is now. He was from an era when mega-venues like Jazz at Lincoln Center hadn’t begun supplanting jazz festivals, and jazz musicians came up with their own ideas about harmony and theory. Musicians like Metcalf mostly plied their trade in nightclubs that offered a much more intimate listening experience. Audiences that wanted to listen to this highly original American music had to do some homework and be willing to make almost as much of a commitment to the music as the artists who played it. While today’s large institutions can provide the opportunity to listen to jazz in a setting that rivals an ideal that listening to recordings provide, the level of disconnect between performer and listener they create might also foster a sense of indifference towards a tradition of aesthetic growth that was part of the jazz experience of the 20th century. It’s something to keep in mind as jazz nears its centenary in the second decade of the 21st.

When Sunny Gets Blue—Remembering Harold Shapero (1920-2013)

Harold Shapero

Harold Shapero, photo from the Library of Congress collection, courtesy Peermusic Classical

“You kids,” Harold Shapero brayed in his trademark voice that sounded like a Boston Brahmin gone extra to seed, or Lenny Bernstein had he smoked even more cigarettes, “you don’t know your harmony. If Nadia Boulanger were alive, she’d be dead.” Or something like that. “When I was in school,” he would say (as eyes rolled near-audibly) “we had to know our harmony.” Harmony, harmony, harmony, apparently we kids—who were not an undistinguished, and were a by-no-means-harmony-ignorant crowd—seemed not to care. Oh sure, he would bristle, we knew our dodecaphony (not a serialist in the bunch), we knew how to work our notation programs (few actually did; this was two decades ago) but we did not know our—say it with me—harmony. Such was the acerbic nature of this graceful and elegant composer, an elder iteration of a young Turk from an era of some pretty astonishing young Turks, wizened but also wise, a composer of a slim but important catalogue, a composer whose career might not have been as expansive and all-important as his early promise showed (whose is?), but more than anything, to the very depths, to the marrow, a perceptive, sharp, elegant, witty, and profound composer. Like many who leave us, he leaves me with that complicated feeling that this was a difficult man and that I wish I’d known him better.

I had the chance to attend classes led by “Sunny” Shapero (or was it “Sonny”?) for a single, important semester in a graduate composition seminar at the New England Conservatory in the mid-1990s—he had been borrowed from nearby Brandeis University, and I was beyond thrilled. I had rolled into Boston the previous year to take my master’s degree, and through my hefty box of Bernsteiniana, Copland-obelia, and Stravinskyologia, Shapero’s name was one I knew well. As the composer of the award-winning Symphony for Classical Orchestra, a close friend of Igor Stravinsky, and, closest to my own vocal-music-loving heart, a dedicatee of one of the songs in Copland’s masterful Twelve Poems of Emily Dickinson, a piece that I wrote many a paper on and even played in public, to the anguish of the notion of pianism (though I suppose I held my own), the name and work of Harold Shapero were known and mythological to me. Much like Arthur Berger, my own teacher at the time (who also had his own Dickinson song—I was racking them up!), Shapero was a name I knew well as a kind of sideman to history, part of a world into which I was dying to be accepted, a world that had vanished before I even had a chance.

Like every reminiscence for the dead, this elegy stands for the living, the dead being gone and therefore disinterested, stranding the author as ill-equipped camera and lens looking at a faded snapshot of someone gone too soon—because everyone is gone too soon. And it is hard for this living composer not to see the departed Shapero as not only the bristling, often vulgar man I remember, but as the end of an era, the period on a sentence, the final clause in an important but also completed chapter—and yet I will try to not calcify him into a notion or a trend or an idea, because while I am still alive and he is gone, he deserves better. He was, while he walked among us, a vastly talented and flawed and wonderful person, in whose once-a-week presence I now understand how fortunate I was to be that important semester so long ago. I cannot believe I have come so far from that, so long has passed, that Shapero has written his last composition and my stories of him—which are legion, some unrepeatable in respectable company—are the last I will have.

Mr. Shapero did not leave us much—two dozen pieces, give or take. More curious (devastating?) was the sad fact (was it?) that he spent the years from 1960 to 1988 quietly not composing. In the words of one of my beloved teachers Malcolm Peyton, discussing that crucial moment when Stravinsky went twelve-tone, the “sky fell out.” And there is truth to this, too much truth. The sixties in sepia retrospect seem really great, but they had to have been also truly terrifying, and maybe Shapero, with his punchy neo-classic dissonances and capacious gifts with a graceful melody, lost his corner of the sky to what must have seemed an ugly and menacing threat coming down the block. It is easy to depersonalize this, or to see the trends of the Great Metanarrative of history as a clean, clear inevitability, but one wonders (if one was not actually there) how personally scary this must have been, to have the toe-hold Shapero had (Rome Prize, pals with Leonard Bernstein and Aaron Copland) and to watch it all potentially sink into a kind of pit of obsolescence—to watch Xenakis, Carter, Boulez et al. ascend the “throne” and likely feel that their world was wrapping up quickly. My then-principal teacher Arthur Berger handled it one way—he went there, composing “with intervals” as he liked to call it, he who coined the word “octatonic” and who wrote some truly astonishingly beautiful works with similar thrust to Shapero, to Copland, to early Elliott Carter—while some, like Ned Rorem and Shapero’s much-vaunted ally Bernstein, simply soldiered on doing what they were doing. And then there was Shapero, who for reasons I was too terrified to ask him (and now wish I’d had more courage) just stopped.

A memory: Stravinsky’s amanuensis Robert Craft came to talk about, yes, Stravinsky, and who joined him in heckling our illustrious host that afternoon, a composer whose name I shall do him the courtesy of omitting. Yes, Sunny Shapero, along with the grumpy set of Arthur Berger, Leon Kirchner, and Craft himself, formed a kind of Statler-and-Waldorf mélange and grumbled their displeasure in a kind of 20th-century charivari. A memory: Shapero, walking along the hallway in the far building, stops to look in a classroom, then stops to contemplate a fire extinguisher for what seemed like an uncomfortably long time, then proceeds. A memory: when I confused a piece of Irving Fine for something Shapero himself had written, and I was vastly embarrassed—he found this hysterical, and complimentary. A memory: Arthur Berger, when in a lesson I told him that I was taking Shapero’s seminar, said that I would not be able to get away with anything because Shapero was that perceptive, something I hold he was both spot on and totally wrong about. A memory: Shapero had been down to Florida and had heard Symphony in Waves by Aaron Kernis, and came back positively raving. Only when he put on a recording of the slow movement, at a certain point, with the movement dragging he felt, he screamed “oh COME ON” at the stereo as the CD spun and spun…
That is not the end of the story. Shapero did return to his work, and when we met him he brimmed with enthusiasm about exactly two things: the trumpet concerto he was writing for Doc Severinson, and his newest love, Finale software. This was, to him, beyond astonishing (and mind you, this was the mid-1990s, when Sibelius was a fledgling software available only on a dedicated Acorn machine and affordable only to the likes of Michael Tilson Thomas). We kids knew this quite well, and many a long, painful seminar hour was passed in discussing these mechanics—at the time, I used only a pencil and a ruler, so this meant little to me. Fine, fair enough, he was entitled to be enthusiastic about a new toy, but one crushing moment happened, one I will never forget. Flush with the excitement of being able to play us his concerto before he submitted it to Mr. Severinson, he brought a CD recording of a MIDI reduction, beaming. And before he hit play, he overran “you kids are about to have your socks knocked off because this sounds like a real orchestra, a little tinny perhaps, but a real goddamn orchestra. You won’t be able to tell the difference.” Needless to say, what came out of those modest speakers on that snowy day in the Boston of my youth sounded nothing—nothing—like a real orchestra. It sounded like an angry video game calliope. I don’t know if furtive glances were actually exchanged, but I will probably never forget that feeling. It felt like rust.

This is also not the end of the story. I do not know what became of the concerto, but a few weeks later I was able to hear the world premiere in Jordan Hall of his woodwind quintet, a piece called Six for Five, and it was genuinely something, frothy, ebullient, spiky—all the watchword Shapero thumbprints were readily in evidence. He fumbled around in the middle of the hall, nervously hectoring his wife to be certain the recording device was working properly. But as usual, once one saw past his coarse exterior, one could tell that something lighted in him, that he was in his element. He smiled broadly as he bowed, left the stage, and though this was years ago, I only saw him one more time. It was in the hallway, and he looked at me and said, “Oh, you were one of the members of our ill-fated class. Did you ever learn your harmony?” I did, Mr. Shapero, thank you, I really did.

***

[Ed. Note: Though mostly remembered today for his 1947 Symphony for Classical Orchestra (which was recorded by both Leonard Bernstein and André Previn), Harold Shapero also composed several piano sonatas as well as a formidable sonata for piano four-hands, a significant sonata for trumpet and piano, several chamber works for strings, a wind quintet, a work for jazz ensemble that Gunther Schuller conducted, and a handful of vocal pieces. New World Records has issued two recordings devoted exclusively to Shapero’s music and has also included additional works by him on various instrumental collections. Below is a recording of the last movement of his String Quartet (featured on one of New World’s all-Shapero recordings), which was composed during his undergraduate years at Harvard and is dedicated to his teacher, Walter Piston. (The entire piece is available on CD from from Amazon and for download from iTunes. The score is available from Peermusic Classical. Hopefully more interpreters in the future will discover this extremely well-crafted and rewarding music.—FJO]